Towards sharing health-services data

Michael D Coory and Craig L Fry
Med J Aust 2012; 196 (7): . || doi: 10.5694/mja11.11238
Published online: 16 April 2012

Data sharing would speed progress in improving the Australian health system

The benefits of data sharing have been demonstrated in genomics, where it has accelerated progress and provided an understanding of complex issues sooner.1 Hoping to emulate this success, 17 funders of research from around the world (including the National Health and Medical Research Council [NHMRC]) recently signed a joint statement committing to do all they can to encourage data sharing from the research that they fund.1

  • 1 Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC.
  • 2 Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC.



We are supported by the Murdoch Childrens Research Institute (Victorian Government Operational Infrastructure Support Program).

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Walport M, Brest P. Sharing research data to improve public health. Lancet 2011; 377: 537-539.
  • 2. Pisani E, AbouZahr C. Sharing health data: good intentions are not enough. Bull World Health Organ 2010; 88: 462-466.
  • 3. COAG Reform Council. National Healthcare Agreement: Performance report for 2009–10. Canberra: CRC, 2011. (accessed Nov 2011).
  • 4. Stanley F. Privacy or public good? Why not obtaining consent may be best practice. Significance 2010; 7: 72-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-9713.2010.00423.x.
  • 5. The Centre for Health Record Linkage. Centre for Health Record Linkage: the first three years, 2006–07 to 2008–09. Sydney: CheReL, 2009, (accessed Nov 2011).
  • 6. National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy. Population Health Research Network. (accessed Mar 2012).
  • 7. National Statistical Service. Vision statement: (accessed Nov 2011).
  • 8. National Health and Medical Research Council. National statement on ethical conduct in human research 2007 [updated 2009]. Canberra: NHMCR, 2007. (accessed Mar 2012).
  • 9. O’Keefe CM, Connolly CJ. Privacy and the use of health data for research. Med J Aust 2010; 193: 537-541. <MJA full text>
  • 10. El Emam K, Dankar FK, Issa R, et al. A globally optimal k-anonymity method for the de-identification of health data. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009; 16: 670-682.
  • 11. Australian Law Reform Commission. The Privacy Act and health information. In: Australian Privacy Law & Practice Report (ALRC Report 108). Canberra: ALRC, 2008. (accessed Nov 2011).
  • 12. Holman CD. An end to suppressing public health information. Med J Aust 2008; 188: 435-436. <MJA full text>
  • 13. Yazahmeidi B, Holman CD. A survey of suppression of public health information by Australian governments. Aust N Z J Public Health 2007; 31: 551-557.
  • 14. Pullman D, Buehler SK, Felt L, et al. Sorry, you can’t have that information: data holder confusion regarding privacy requirements for personal health information and the potential chilling effect on health research. Healthc Policy 2009; 4: 61-76.
  • 15. Straus SE, Tetroe J, Graham I. Defining knowledge translation. CMAJ 2009; 181: 165-168.
  • 16. Heritage Provider Network. Health Prize Competition, 2011. (accessed Nov 2011).


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.