Connect
MJA
MJA

What’s the score in pain assessment?

Carl L von Baeyer
Med J Aust 2012; 196 (6): 379. || doi: 10.5694/mja12.10314
Published online: 2 April 2012

Carl von Baeyer explores realistic pain assessment when self-report conflicts with observation and context

Self-report measures of pain intensity provide important primary outcomes in randomised trials of pain-relieving interventions. Scores from numerical, visual analogue, and other scales serve well in comparing group outcomes.1 But in the context of individual clinical treatment, certain catchphrases are commonly employed. Self-report of pain is “the gold standard”. Pain intensity scores are “the fifth vital sign”. Analgesic decisions are sometimes based on an “algorithm” that includes self-report of pain. Although such concepts help to draw attention to pain management, each one contributes to oversimplification of the process of assessing pain.

  • Carl L von Baeyer

  • University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.

Correspondence: carl.vonbaeyer@usask.ca

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Responses are now closed for this article.