Targeted primary care-based mental health services for young Australians
Authors: Ian B Hickie, Daniel F Hermens and Elizabeth M Scott
Published online: 4 June 2012
In reply: The detailed demographic, diagnostic and disability data we presented1 responds directly to the critics of headspace clinics. Following the initial establishment phase,1 our two centres now provide services to 390 and 411 young people per month, respectively (data from July to September 2011). Each of the 30 established headspace services now assesses an average of 265 clients per month and, collectively, they have assisted 64 167 young people from mid 2007 to the end of 2011 (data from headspace national office). Although some people do not recognise the extent to which headspace services connect with more young people, the more dispassionate reader is invited to make their own judgement.
The academic support that the Brain and Mind Research Institute provides to our headspace services is critical. We have a long track record of population health and health services innovation, and ongoing and systematic evaluation.2-5 By contrast, Raven’s characterisation of this work as “lobbying”, “misrepresentation”, “inappropriate medicalisation” and being informed by “undeclared competing interests” has no basis in fact. Our conclusions are based directly on the data presented. The references provided are relevant. With regard to the terminology describing “vocational impairment”, we simply reported the vocational disruption experienced by the young people.
We did not dismiss a key finding of the 1997 National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing — in fact, we did not reference it. We suggested that our findings challenge “existing beliefs about the extent to which young people with mental health problems do not perceive a need for care”,1 citing the relevant 2007 National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing reference. We did not omit any relevant links, financial or otherwise, with any entity that could be perceived to represent a conflict of interest with this report.
Against the view of some historical, professional and cultural interests, we have been at the forefront of the establishment of psychological care in primary care settings.2-5 Our data underpinned the original decision (in 2001, not 2006) to provide Australians with increased financial support for use of psychological services.5 This is not, and never was, an act of inappropriate medicalisation.
As recognised by the Australian Government (who are now supporting headspace to expand to 90 centres nationally), these clinics provide young people and their families with access to sophisticated assessment and appropriate psychological care.
Competing interests
References
- Scott EM, Hermens DF, Glozier N, et al. Targeted primary care-based mental health services for young Australians. Med J Aust 2012; 196: 136-140. 0_CACGIDEJ
- Hickie IB. “Not in your lifetime, Ian!” Med J Aust 2009; 191: 638-642. 0_i1142882
- Pirkis J, Hickie I, Young L, et al. An evaluation of beyondblue: Australia’s national depression initiative. Int J Mental Health Promotion 2005; 7: 35-53. 0_pgfId-1152491
- Hickie IB, Pirkis JE, Blashki GA, et al. General practitioners’ response to depression and anxiety in the Australian community: a preliminary analysis. Med J Aust 2004; 181 (7 Suppl): S15-S20. 0_pgfId-1152501
- Hickie IB, Davenport TA, Naismith SL, et al. Treatment of common mental disorders in Australian general practice. Med J Aust 2001; 175 (2 Suppl): S25-S30. 0_i1142888