Shared care for chronic eye diseases: perspectives of ophthalmologists, optometrists and patients

Med J Aust 2012; 196 (10): 646-650. || doi: 10.5694/mja11.10856


Objective: To report the perspectives of optometrists, ophthalmologists and patients on a model of shared care for patients with chronic eye diseases.

Design, setting and participants: Qualitative study of a model of shared care between optometrists and ophthalmologists for patients with stable age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy and glaucoma, trialled by the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital in Melbourne during 2007–2009. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with optometrists, ophthalmologists and patients at completion of the project to obtain their perspectives on this model.

Results: Seventeen optometrists submitted expressions of interest to participate, and 12 completed web-based training modules and clinical observerships and adhered to specified examination and reporting protocols. All five participating ophthalmologists and 11 of the optometrists were interviewed. Ninety-eight patients participated and 37 were interviewed. Optometrists not only met ophthalmologists’ expectations but exceeded them, appropriately detecting and referring patients with additional, previously undetected conditions. Patients reported savings in travel time and were satisfied with the quality of care they received. Optometrists, ophthalmologists and patients indicated a general acceptance of shared care arrangements, although there were some issues relating to interprofessional trust.

Conclusions: Shared care between local optometrists and hospital-based ophthalmologists can help to reduce patient waiting time for review and offers an opportunity for these two groups of eye care professionals to collaborate in providing localised care for the benefit of patients. However, trust and relationship building need to be further developed.

  • Patricia M O’Connor1,2
  • C Alex Harper1,2
  • Cathy L Brunton2
  • Sandra J Clews2
  • Sharon A Haymes1,2
  • Jill E Keeffe1,2

  • 1 Centre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC.
  • 2 Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, VIC.

Correspondence: jillek@unimelb.edu.au


This 2-year National Eye Health Demonstration Project was funded by the Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, with additional funds from the Victorian Department of Health. This research was supported by the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital. The Centre for Eye Research Australia receives operational infrastructure support from the Victorian Government. We acknowledge the support and cooperation of all the ophthalmologists, optometrists, support staff and patients involved, and the contribution of the project manager, Bich Thai.

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Department of Health and Ageing. National framework for action to promote eye health and prevent avoidable blindness and vision loss. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2005. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/ageing-eyehealth-framework-toc.htm (accessed Apr 2012).
  • 2. Access Economics. Clear insight. The economic impact and cost of vision loss in Australia. Melbourne: Centre for Eye Research Australia, 2004. http://www.cera.org.au/uploads/CERA_clearinsight.pdf (accessed Apr 2012).
  • 3. Bhargava JS, Bhan-Bhargava Foss AJ, King AJ. Views of glaucoma patients on provision of follow-up care; an assessment of patient preferences by conjoint analysis. Br J Ophthalmol 2008; 92: 1601-1605.
  • 4. Banes MJ, Culham LE, Bunce C, et al. Agreement between optometrists and ophthalmologists on clinical management decisions for patients with glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 2006; 90: 579-585.
  • 5. Gray SF, Spry PGD, Brookes ST, et al. The Bristol Shared Care Glaucoma Study: outcome at follow up at 2 years. Br J Ophthalmol 2000; 84: 456-463.
  • 6. Myers RI. Interprofessional strategies for optometry and ophthalmology in the future. Optom Vis Sci 1995; 72: 42-44.
  • 7. Long R. Eye health labour force in Australia. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2009. (AIHW Cat. No. PHE 116.)
  • 8. National Health and Medical Research Council. Guidelines for the management of diabetic retinopathy. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2008. http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/synopses/di15syn.htm (accessed Jun 2011).
  • 9. National Health and Medical Research Council. Guidelines for the screening, prognosis, diagnosis, management and prevention of glaucoma. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2010. http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/synopses/cp113syn.htm (accessed Jun 2011).
  • 10. Lu CY, Lu VH, Goldberg I, Day RO. Towards integrated care: Australia’s new model of care for patients with glaucoma [editorial]. Med J Aust 2010; 193: 200-201. <MJA full text>
  • 11. Keily PM, Horton P, Chakman J. The Australian optometric workforce 2009. Clin Exp Optom 2010; 93: 330-340.
  • 12. Lane C, Michel K. Community mapping project report: mapping communities using the Eye and Ear Hospital and identifying the needs of Victoria’s changing population. Melbourne: Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, 2008. http://www.cera.org.au/uploads/CERA_RVEEH_Community_Mapping_Report.pdf (accessed Jun 2011).
  • 13. Association of Optometrists. Primary care resource pack: glaucoma – draft protocol. 2002. http://www.assoc-optometrists.org/uploaded_files/pdf/draft_protocol.pdf (accessed Jun 2011; no longer available).
  • 14. American Optometric Association. Optometric clinical practice guideline: care of the patient with age-related macular degeneration. St Louis, Mo: AOA, 2004. http://www.aoa.org/documents/CPG-6.pdf (accessed Jun 2011).
  • 15. Kong YX, Coote MA, O’Neill EC, et al. Glaucomatous optic neuropathy evaluation project: a standardized internet system for assessing skills in optic disc examination. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2011; 39: 308-317.
  • 16. Corbin JM, Strauss AL. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage, 2008.
  • 17. Speed S, Luker KA. Getting a visit: how district nurses and general practitioners ‘organise’ each other in primary care. Sociol Health Illn 2006; 28: 883-902.
  • 18. Liaw ST, Peterson G. Doctor and pharmacist — back to the apothecary! Aust Health Rev 2009; 33: 268-278.
  • 19. Wright SE, McKay R, Taylor KI, et al; Working Group for the Evaluation of NHMRC Retinopathy Guideline Distribution. Changes in attitudes and practices of optometrists in their management of diabetic retinopathy after the release of NHMRC guidelines. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2001; 29: 121-124.
  • 20. Wackerhausen S. Collaboration, professional identity and reflection across boundaries. J Interprof Care 2009; 23: 455-473.
  • 21. Schuman JS. Glaucoma care: the patients’ perspective. What do patients want? Br J Ophthalmol 2008; 92: 1571-1572.


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article