Clear guidance is needed on what information should be publicly available, and for how long
One of the fundamental realignments that has occurred to the doctor–patient relationship is the capacity of patients to acquire information from the internet and, on the basis of it, interact with their practitioners in new and different ways. Some of the knowledge that is readily accessible is empowering; much of it requires discernment and knowledge to enable informed evaluation. An emerging role for medical practitioners is to mediate such information, contextualise it and interpret it for their patients.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. Federation of State Medical Boards. On-line physician profile request. https://s1.fsmb.org/Docinfo/OnlineOrder.aspx (accessed May 2012).
- 2. General Medical Council. List of registered medical practitioners. http://www.gmc-uk.org/doctors/register/LRMP.asp (accessed May 2012).
- 3. Davies M. Medical self-regulation: crisis and change. Dartmouth: Ashgate, 2007.
- 4. Healy JM, Maffi CL, Dugdale P. A national medical register: balancing public transparency and professional privacy. Med J Aust 2008; 188: 247-249.
- 5. Colyer S. Keep doctor sanctions on record. Australian Doctor 2012; 17 Feb.
No relevant disclosures.