Connect
MJA
MJA

Should doctors feel able to practise according to their personal values and beliefs? — No

Julian Savulescu
Med J Aust 2011; 195 (9) || doi: 10.5694/mja11.11249
Published online: 7 November 2011

NO: Ethicist Julian Savulescu believes patient safety lies in objective moral standards

CConscientious objection by doctors, as is commonly practised, is discriminatory medicine. Only a fully justified and publicly accepted set of objective values results in ethical medicine as a proper public service with agreed and justified moral and legal standards to which doctors should be held.

The full article is accessible to AMA
members and paid subscribers.
Login to MJA or subscribe now.


  • Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.



Acknowledgements: 

I receive financial support from the Uehiro Foundation on Ethics and Education; Wellcome Trust Grant no: 086041/Z/08/Z ; and the Oxford Martin School.

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Strickland SL. Conscientious objection in medical students: a questionnaire survey. J Med Ethics 2011; Jul 18. Epub ahead of print. doi:10.1136/jme.2011.042770.
  • 2. Hope T, Savulescu J, Hendrick J. Medical ethics and law: the core curriculum. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2003.
  • 3. Savulescu J. Rational non-interventional paternalism: why doctors ought to make judgments of what is best for their patients. J Med Ethics 1995; 21: 327-331.
  • 4. Savulescu J. Liberal rationalism and medical decision-making. Bioethics 1997; 11: 115-129.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.