Referral pathways in colorectal cancer: findings from a qualitative study in general practice
Authors: Mark F Harris, Shane W Pascoe, Lisa J Crossland, Justin J Beilby, Craig Veitch and Allan D Spigelman
Published online: 15 August 2011
To the Editor: Despite the availability of clinical guidelines,1 management of patients with colorectal cancer is variable.2 The lack of a clear referral pathway can delay this journey3 and result in patients not receiving optimal care.4 To increase our understanding of factors influencing the referral of patients with colorectal cancer from general practice to specialists, we examined the views of 19 general practitioners in four focus groups — held in rural and urban New South Wales, rural Queensland, and urban South Australia.
The relationships of these GPs with specialists not only helped expedite referral but also improved quality of care and feedback. The GPs considered that direct personal contact enhanced their relationships with specialists. This was cultivated over time and was seen as a measure of the GPs’ commitment to getting the best care for their patients. This was especially important for the GPs in rural and remote areas who advocated for patient needs, including travel for diagnosis and treatment and completion of follow-up care. The GPs felt that influencing the referral process required overcoming barriers within the public health system and/or facilitating referral to private providers. GPs preferred referral to the private health services compared with referral to the public system because of perceived delays and communication difficulties in the public system.
GPs described a system of referral that was ad hoc and not informed by best practice guidelines or outcomes. They were most influenced by the ease of access to appropriate and timely consultations and the quality of feedback from specialists. Although this works well much of the time, we need a system in the public and private health sectors that identifies patients who may have cancer, investigates and treats them in a timely fashion, and delivers care that meets optimal standards. As patients of surgeons with higher caseloads tend to have better outcomes,5 GPs need better information about surgeon caseload. Finally, as we increasingly move towards working in multidisciplinary teams, it would be useful for GPs to have information regarding other support staff linked to surgeons.
Acknowledgements
References
- Australian Cancer Network. Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention, early detection and management of colorectal cancer. Canberra: NHMRC, 2005.
- Barrett J, Jiwa M, Rose P, Hamilton W. Pathways to the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: an observational study in three UK cities. Fam Pract 2006; 23: 15-19. 0_i1095853
- Scott MA, Knight A, Brown K, Novell JR. A single common urgent pathway for all colorectal referrals reduces time to diagnosis and treatment. Colorectal Dis 2006; 8: 766-771. 0_i1095855
- Spigelman AD. People with colorectal cancer: can we help them do better? ANZ J Surg 2004; 74: 401-402. 0_i1095857
- Archampong D, Borowski DW, Dickinson HO. Impact of surgeon volume on outcomes of rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgeon 2010; 8: 341-352. 0_i1095861
Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer With Liver-Only Metastases: A Retrospective Cohort Study Integrating Prospectively Collected Real-World Clinical and Molecular Data From an Australian National Database (2009–2024) to Guide Treatment Planning
Savio G. Barreto, Christos S. Karapetis, Shahid Ullah, Matthew Burge, Susan Caird, Angus Campbell, Azim Jalali, Ross Jennens, Muhammad A. Khattak, Belinda Lee, Stephanie H. Lim, Shehara Mendis, Louise Nott, Timothy J. Price, Jeremy D. Shapiro, Jeanne Tie, Javier Torres, Colin Williams, Rachel Wong, Vanessa Wong, Peter Gibbs
Australian Pathways for Specialist Pain Management and Early Palliative Care for People With Pancreatic Cancer: Developed Using a Community Consensus Approach
Jennifer Philip, Melanie R. Lovell, Kylee Bellingham, Gail Garvey, Gregory B. Crawford, Nicole M. Rankin, Kara Burns, Isabel Young, Vivienne Milch, Dorothy Keefe, Katrina Anderson, James Lawson, Meinir Krishnasamy
Cause‐specific mortality among Queensland people with cirrhosis, by cirrhosis aetiology and decompensation status, 2007–22: a retrospective cohort study
Vikas Bhasker, Jessica R Fong, Paul J Clark, Gunter F Hartel, Richard Skoien, James O’Beirne, Elizabeth E Powell, Patricia C Valery
Clinical practice guidelines for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance for people at high risk in Australia: summary of recommendations
Jacob George, Nicole L Allard, Stuart K Roberts, Leon A Adams, Jane Davies, Behzad Hajarizadeh, Jennifer H MacLachlan, Suzanne E Mahady, Rosalie Altus, Catherine Brown, David C Fry, Belinda Greenwood‐Smith, Natali Smud, Patricia C Valery, Nafisa Yussf, Kate Broun, Denise Campbell, Karen Canfell, Chelsea Carle Harrison, Victoria Freeman, Paul Grogan, Catherine Holliday, Suzanne Hughes, Anna Kelly, Cathelijne Kemenade, Claire Latumahina, Amanda McAtamney, Megan Varlow, Joachim Worthington, Susan Yuill, Eleonora Feletto
Assessment of metabolic dysfunction‐associated fatty liver disease in primary care: a consensus statement summary
Leon A Adams, William W Kemp, Kate R Muller, Elizabeth E Powell, Stuart K Roberts, Luis Calzadilla Bertot, Stephanie Best, Gary Deed, Jon D Emery, Samantha L Hocking, Graham R Jones, John S Lubel, Sinead Sheils, Stephen M Twigg, Gerald F Watts, Jacob George
Treatment outcomes for people with hepatitis C referred to tertiary care in Victoria, 2021–22: a retrospective observational study
Elly Layton, Nicole Matthews, Brendan Quinn, Nasra Higgins, Gabrielle Lindeman, Mielle Abbott, Jennifer MacLachlan, Elizabeth Birbilis, Margaret E Hellard, Joseph Doyle, Benjamin C Cowie, Mark Stoové