Research, information and consent for the Australian Health Survey: a separate standard for Indigenous people?
Author: Wendy E Hoy
Published online: 1 August 2011
In reply: I thank Dr Rowley and Mr Thorpe for their response.1 It is hard to justify exclusion of any Australian from opportunities to participate fully in important initiatives on the recommendation of bodies whose membership sometimes has no direct link to the persons affected. There is no other population group in Australia to whom this applies.
Medical and clinical approaches should complement initiatives to address critical social and cultural issues; they are not in competition nor mutually exclusive. The inclusion of health measures in the adult (but not youth) components of the Australian Health Survey (AHS) acknowledges that there is much to be learned and remediated clinically.
Any interpretation of the deliberate exclusion of Indigenous youth from the “measures” elements of the survey is unsettling. There is more, not less, to be learned from this group. Their exclusion deprives policymakers of robust evidence that could improve health status. It condemns enquiry to the current sidestream method of short-term research projects on small pockets of people. These sometimes yield results of dubious generalisability and cause ongoing competition for the impossibly stretched research dollar. Alternatively, is it implied that Indigenous parents are less able to make sound decisions on their child’s participation or that the minors are less likely to cooperate?
I suggest that the matter of participation in the AHS be aired through general media channels, as well as those with an Indigenous focus, such as “Living Black” (SBS television) and Imparja television, and through local Indigenous radio stations and community networks. With a developed sampling frame for Indigenous people, dialogue about elements of the examination should at least be conducted with the specific individual tribal groups or communities, if not with the targeted individuals (the preferred option). Subsequently, the whole issue of representation to policymakers in Indigenous health matters might be re-examined on a national basis.
References
- Rowley KG, Thorpe AH. Research, information and consent for the Australian Health Survey: a separate standard for Indigenous people [letter]? Med J Aust 2011; 195: 000. JGDIFIJI
Watchful Waiting Compared With Immediate Antibiotics for Urban Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children With Uncomplicated Acute Otitis Media (WATCH): A Non-Inferiority Randomised Controlled Trial
Jennifer S. Reath, Hasantha Gunasekera, Sanja Lujic, Amanda J. Leach, Letitia Campbell, Robyn Walsh, Tim Usherwood, Geoffrey K. Spurling, Claudette A. Tyson, Deborah A. Askew, Kelvin Kong, Chelsea J. Watego, Peter Morris, Wendy Hu, Penelope A. Abbott
Beds Still Burning: Suicide Should Not Be in the Vocabulary of Children
Rudi Louis Taylor-Bragge
Weight Loss Medication Marketing and First Nations People: Disease Awareness or Corporate Profit?
Troy Walker, Simone Sherriff, Jennifer Browne
Beyond Mammography: Sovereignty and Relational Breast Care With Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Women
Devaleena Das, Jessica Gildersleeve, Amy Thomson, Aunty Gracelyn Smallwood, Lorelle Holland
Responding to the Revised First Nations Health and Cultural Safety Accreditation Standards in Australian Primary Medical Education: Institutional Principles and Qualities for Meaningful Progress
Sophie Pitt, Ashlee Williams-Barnes, Ryan Dashwood, Keira Edwards, Paul Saunders
Drivers of Vaccine Uptake for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children to Inform Tailored Strategies: A Qualitative Study Exploring Health Service Provider Perspective
Bianca F. Middleton, Kristy Crooks, Kylie Taylor, Elizabeth Harwood, Katrina K. Clark, Caitlin Kent, Kelly McCrory, Marita Hefler, Jessica Kaufman, David N. Durrheim, Margie H. Danchin