Letters
Mental health Pharmacology
Volume 194 - Issue 6

Bipolar disorder supplement needed broader perspective

Authors:  Jon N Jureidini, Peter I Parry, Catherine M Houen and Malcolm W Battersby

Med J Aust 2011; 194 (6): 326. || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb02992.x
Published online: 21 March 2011
Download PDF (67 KB)
Share: Share on Blue Sky Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share by email

To the Editor: The supplement of the Journal published on 16 August 2010 — “Bipolar disorder: new understandings, emerging treatments”1 — illustrates a number of features of the current implementation of the Journal’s supplement policy that are problematic. While it is clearly stated that the supplement “was supported by an unconditional grant from AstraZeneca Neuroscience”, the amount of sponsorship, to whom it was paid, and how it was used were not disclosed. Such information is particularly pertinent as evidence suggests that the pharmaceutical industry has financial motivation to see a widening of the diagnostic boundaries of bipolar disorder and a rebadging of atypical antipsychotics as “mood stabilisers”.2

The provenance of the articles is not revealed — it is not clear whether the articles were solicited, part of a symposium, or from some other source. Bipolar disorder is a controversial area in psychiatry,3 yet despite much useful information in the articles in the supplement, discussion of this controversy is a minor feature and no significant critical appraisal is offered. To give a more balanced view to readers, it would have been desirable to have included articles that highlight the controversy regarding bipolar II and bipolar spectrum diagnoses and discuss the ways in which personality disorders arising from developmental trauma and attachment problems can present with mood and behavioural disturbances that can be confused with bipolar disorder.

Authors

  • Jon N Jureidini1
  • Peter I Parry2
  • Catherine M Houen3
  • Malcolm W Battersby2
  • 1. University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA.
  • 2. Flinders University, Adelaide, SA.
  • 3. Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, SA.

Correspondence: peter.parry@health.sa.gov.au

Competing interests

Jon Jureidini, Peter Parry and Malcolm Battersby are members of Healthy Skepticism.

References

View this article on Wiley Online Library

More like this

Mental health Perspective 20 July 2026 Open Access

Reorienting Allied Health Into Community-Based Care for People Experiencing Trauma and Social Disadvantage

Simon Rosenbaum, Grace McKeon, Gulsah Kurt, Oscar Lederman, Kemi Wright, Sabuj Kanti Mistry, Jackie E. Curtis, Philip B. Ward, Zachary Steel, Hamish Fibbins, Rachel Morell, Melissa C. Eaton, Andrew Watkins, Ben Harris-Roxas, Brendan Goodger, Eleanor Beck, Megan Teychenne, Joseph Firth, Davy Vancampfort, David Burns, Russell Roberts, Tristan Favaloro, Danielle Weber, Rosanna Barbero, Vasili Maroulis, Melissa Holmes, Stefan Mackenzie, Chiara Mastrogiovanni, Afsana Anwar, Uzma Choudhry, Catherine Sherrington, Jane Currie, Thomas Gadsden, Scott Teasdale

View more