Female genital mutilation: Australian law, policy and practical challenges for doctors

Ben Mathews
Med J Aust 2011; 194 (3): 139-141.


  • The issue of whether medical practitioners should perform “ritual nicks” as a method of meeting demand for female genital mutilation (FGM) has recently been debated in the United States and Australia.

  • Due to increasing numbers of people arriving and settling in Australia from African nations in which FGM is customary, demand for FGM in Australia is present and may be increasing.

  • Australian law clearly prohibits performance of any type of FGM.

  • FGM is also prohibited by the most recent policy of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG).

  • For legal, medical and social reasons, the RANZCOG policy is sound, and medical practitioners should not administer FGM in any form.

  • Development of an evidence base regarding incidence of and attitudes towards FGM, and the need for post-FGM treatment, would help inform sound policy and practical responses.

  • Strategies adopted in African nations to abolish FGM may assist in refining educational and supportive efforts.

Please login with your free MJA account to view this article in full

  • Ben Mathews

  • Faculty of Law, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD.


Competing interests:

None identified.

  • 1. Tatnell P. Circumcising young girls is child abuse: Goward. Sydney Morning Herald 2010; 28 May. (accessed Aug 2010).
  • 2. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. No change in peak body view on female genital mutilation [media release]. 2010; 28 May. (accessed Aug 2010).
  • 3. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics. Policy statement: ritual genital cutting of female minors. Pediatrics 2010; 125: 1088-1093.
  • 4. American Academy of Pediatrics Board of Directors. Policy statement: ritual genital cutting of female minors. Pediatrics 2010; 126: 191.
  • 5. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Migration, Australia, 2008–09. Canberra: ABS, 2010. (ABS Cat. No. 3412.0.)
  • 6. Australian Government Department of Immigration and Citizenship. Settler arrivals 1998–99 to 2008–09, Australia, states and territories. Canberra: DIC, 2009.
  • 7. Family Law Council. Female genital mutilation. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 1994: 18.
  • 8. Bourke E. Female circumcision happening in Australia. ABC News 2010; 6 Feb. (accessed Aug 2010).
  • 9. Office of the High Commissioner For Human Rights, Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS, United Nations Development Programme, et al. Eliminating female genital mutilation: an interagency statement. Geneva: Word Health Organization, 2008.
  • 10. Barstow DG. Female genital mutilation: the penultimate gender abuse. Child Abuse Negl 1999; 23: 501-510.
  • 11. Yoder PS, Khan S. Numbers of women circumcised in Africa: the production of a total. Calverton, Md: Macro International, 2008.
  • 12. Secretary, Department of Health and Community Services v JWB and SMB (1992) 175 CLR 218.
  • 13. Mathews BP. Children and consent to medical treatment. In: White B, McDonald F, Willmott L, editors. Health law in Australia. Sydney: Thomson Reuters, 2010: 113-147.
  • 14. Crimes Act 1900 (ACT) s. 74.
  • 15. Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s. 45.
  • 16. Criminal Code Act (NT) s. 186B.
  • 17. Criminal Code Act 1899 (Qld) s. 323A.
  • 18. Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 (SA) s. 33A.
  • 19. Criminal Code Act 1924 (Tas) s. 178A.
  • 20. Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) s. 32.
  • 21. Criminal Code Act Compilation Act 1913 (WA) s. 306.
  • 22. Adam T, Bathija H, Bishai D, et al. Estimating the obstetric costs of female genital mutilation in six African countries. Bull World Health Organ 2010; 88: 281-288.
  • 23. Morris K. Issues on female genital mutilation/cutting — progress and parallels. Lancet 2006; 368: S64-S67.
  • 24. Wakabi W. Africa battles to make female genital mutilation history. Lancet 2007; 369: 1069-1070.
  • 25. Victorian Department of Human Services Primary Health Branch. Interim guidelines for the Family and Reproductive Rights Education Program. Melbourne: DHS, 2009. (accessed Aug 2010).


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Responses are now closed for this article.