The issue of whether medical practitioners should perform “ritual nicks” as a method of meeting demand for female genital mutilation (FGM) has recently been debated in the United States and Australia.
Due to increasing numbers of people arriving and settling in Australia from African nations in which FGM is customary, demand for FGM in Australia is present and may be increasing.
Australian law clearly prohibits performance of any type of FGM.
FGM is also prohibited by the most recent policy of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG).
For legal, medical and social reasons, the RANZCOG policy is sound, and medical practitioners should not administer FGM in any form.
Development of an evidence base regarding incidence of and attitudes towards FGM, and the need for post-FGM treatment, would help inform sound policy and practical responses.
Strategies adopted in African nations to abolish FGM may assist in refining educational and supportive efforts.
- 1. Tatnell P. Circumcising young girls is child abuse: Goward. Sydney Morning Herald 2010; 28 May. http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/wellbeing/cicrcumcising-young-girls-is-child-abuse-goward-20100528-wjhc.html (accessed Aug 2010).
- 2. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. No change in peak body view on female genital mutilation [media release]. 2010; 28 May. http://www.ranzcog.edu.au/media/pdfs/MR-May-28-2010-College-Postion-on-FGM.pdf (accessed Aug 2010).
- 3. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics. Policy statement: ritual genital cutting of female minors. Pediatrics 2010; 125: 1088-1093.
- 4. American Academy of Pediatrics Board of Directors. Policy statement: ritual genital cutting of female minors. Pediatrics 2010; 126: 191.
- 5. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Migration, Australia, 2008–09. Canberra: ABS, 2010. (ABS Cat. No. 3412.0.)
- 6. Australian Government Department of Immigration and Citizenship. Settler arrivals 1998–99 to 2008–09, Australia, states and territories. Canberra: DIC, 2009.
- 7. Family Law Council. Female genital mutilation. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 1994: 18.
- 8. Bourke E. Female circumcision happening in Australia. ABC News 2010; 6 Feb. http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/02/06/2812147.htm (accessed Aug 2010).
- 9. Office of the High Commissioner For Human Rights, Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS, United Nations Development Programme, et al. Eliminating female genital mutilation: an interagency statement. Geneva: Word Health Organization, 2008.
- 10. Barstow DG. Female genital mutilation: the penultimate gender abuse. Child Abuse Negl 1999; 23: 501-510.
- 11. Yoder PS, Khan S. Numbers of women circumcised in Africa: the production of a total. Calverton, Md: Macro International, 2008.
- 12. Secretary, Department of Health and Community Services v JWB and SMB (1992) 175 CLR 218.
- 13. Mathews BP. Children and consent to medical treatment. In: White B, McDonald F, Willmott L, editors. Health law in Australia. Sydney: Thomson Reuters, 2010: 113-147.
- 14. Crimes Act 1900 (ACT) s. 74.
- 15. Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s. 45.
- 16. Criminal Code Act (NT) s. 186B.
- 17. Criminal Code Act 1899 (Qld) s. 323A.
- 18. Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 (SA) s. 33A.
- 19. Criminal Code Act 1924 (Tas) s. 178A.
- 20. Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) s. 32.
- 21. Criminal Code Act Compilation Act 1913 (WA) s. 306.
- 22. Adam T, Bathija H, Bishai D, et al. Estimating the obstetric costs of female genital mutilation in six African countries. Bull World Health Organ 2010; 88: 281-288.
- 23. Morris K. Issues on female genital mutilation/cutting — progress and parallels. Lancet 2006; 368: S64-S67.
- 24. Wakabi W. Africa battles to make female genital mutilation history. Lancet 2007; 369: 1069-1070.
- 25. Victorian Department of Human Services Primary Health Branch. Interim guidelines for the Family and Reproductive Rights Education Program. Melbourne: DHS, 2009. http://www.health.vic.gov.au/vwhp/downloads/interim_guidelines_3.pdf (accessed Aug 2010).
Publication of your online response is subject to the Medical Journal of Australia's editorial discretion. You will be notified by email within five working days should your response be accepted.