In defence of calcium

B E Christopher Nordin
Med J Aust 2011; 194 (1): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb04133.x
Published online: 3 January 2011

Reports of adverse events related to calcium supplementation should be supported by rigorous evidence

Calcium is an essential nutrient, not only because of its major role in bone, where 99% of it is stored, but because of its central role in neuromuscular function. It is this latter role that explains why ionised calcium in the blood and tissue fluids is one of the most tightly controlled analytes of those that are commonly measured.1 However, maintenance of the calcium level in tissue fluids carries with it the penalty of continuous loss of calcium through the kidneys, bowel and skin, even on a low calcium intake, which is why the recommended daily calcium allowance for adults is relatively high, at 1000 mg.2

  • B E Christopher Nordin1,2

  • 1 Endocrine and Metabolic Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA.
  • 2 Discipline of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA.


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.