To the Editor: Recent articles in the Journal by Forge1 and Thompson2 expressing contradictory opinions on the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS) highlight the difficulties in formulating guidelines for this condition.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, VIC.
Correspondence: richard.harper@med.monash.edu.au
- 1. Forge BH. The “Acute coronary syndromes: consensus recommendations for translating knowledge into action” position statement is based on a false premise. Med J Aust 2010; 192: 696-699. <MJA full text>
- 2. Thompson PL. The invasive approach to acute coronary syndrome: true promise or false premise [editorial]. Med J Aust 2010; 192: 694-695. <MJA full text>
- 3. de Winter RJ, Windhausen F, Cornel JH, et al; Invasive versus Conservative Treatment in Unstable Coronary Syndromes (ICTUS) Investigators. Early invasive versus selectively invasive management for acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 1095-1104.
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.