Letters
Cardiovascular diseases Pharmacology
Volume 193 - Issue 6

Managing residual risk in patients receiving statin therapy

Author:  Ian R Hamilton-Craig

Med J Aust 2010; 193 (6): 375-376. || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03957.x
Published online: 20 September 2010
Download PDF (90 KB)
Share: Share on Blue Sky Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share by email

In reply: I agree with Montgomery that cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes are required to determine the role of ezetimibe. The Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis (SEAS) trial (in which patients with aortic stenosis were treated for 52.2 months with statin plus ezetimibe or statin plus placebo) showed a 4.7% reduction in ischaemic CVD events in the ezetimibe group (P = 0.02; number needed to treat, 23), driven by a reduced need for coronary artery bypass grafting.1 In contrast to previous trials showing regression of atherosclerosis in response to statin therapy, baseline carotid intima media thickness (CIMT) levels in the ENHANCE (Ezetimibe and Simvastatin in Hypercholesterolemia Enhances Atherosclerosis Regression) trial were normal, due to previous statin therapy. This is likely to account for the lack of change in CIMT with ezetimibe treatment in the ENHANCE trial.2 As no placebo group was included, neither lack of benefit nor harm from ezetimibe therapy can be inferred.2

Data from animal studies have shown atherosclerosis regression after ezetimibe treatment through multiple mechanisms.3-5 Prospective randomised controlled trials with statins, resins or surgery have independently shown an approximate 1% reduction in CVD per 1% reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level. Evidence for the benefits of lowering LDL-C is among the most robust in medicine. Pending the outcomes of IMPROVE-IT (the Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial, a multicentre study of ezetimibe plus simvastatin versus simvastatin treatment of patients with acute coronary syndrome [http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00202878]), or clinical outcome data confirming those of the ARBITER 6-HALTS (Arterial Biology for the Investigation of the Treatment Effects of Reducing Cholesterol 6 — HDL and LDL Treatment Strategies in Atherosclerosis) trial,6 it seems reasonable to continue to use ezetimibe to lower LDL-C levels in patients who are not achieving LDL-C targets despite statin therapy or who are intolerant to statins. Extended-release nicotinic acid (Niaspan [Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, Ill, USA]) may be an appropriate alternative to statins as second-line therapy, and should be made available under the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme for treating patients with dyslipidaemia. (Niaspan has approval from the Therapeutic Goods Administration for marketing in Australia, but is not being imported into Australia at this stage.)

Author

  • Ian R Hamilton-Craig1
  • 1. School of Medicine, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD.

Correspondence: ian.hamilton-craig@griffith.edu.au

Competing interests

Ian Hamilton-Craig has served on lipid advisory boards for Merck Sharp and Dohme, Solvay/Abbott and AstraZeneca, and has received speaker fees and reimbursement for travel/accommodation expenses to attend scientific meetings from these companies. He has also received honoraria from these companies and from Novartis, Pfizer, Schering Plough and Servier for presentations at postgraduate scientific meetings.

References

View this article on Wiley Online Library

More like this

View more