Cardiovascular risk perception and evidence–practice gaps in Australian general practice

Emma L Heeley, Craig S Anderson, Anushka A Patel, Alan Cass, David P Peiris and John P Chalmers
Med J Aust 2010; 193 (2): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03824.x
Published online: 19 July 2010

In reply: We thank Radford for his insightful comments, seasoned with spice from the frontline of primary care. Although guidelines are an accepted part of clinical practice, they are just recommendations and are not without their limitations. Treatments need to be individually tailored according to many factors. Our aim, therefore, was to provide a current snapshot of adherence to cardiovascular guidelines in primary care in Australia.1 It would be naive of us to think that there would be complete adherence to the guidelines in the “real world”. We wished to obtain an overall benchmark figure and, more importantly, identify treatment gaps or disparities in care across important patient subgroups defined by risk of cardiovascular event.

  • Emma L Heeley2
  • Craig S Anderson3
  • Anushka A Patel4
  • Alan Cass5
  • David P Peiris6
  • John P Chalmers7

  • The George Institute for International Health, Sydney, NSW.



remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.