Connect
MJA
MJA

Antibiotic prophylaxis for cardiac surgery — are we getting it right?

Keryn J Christiansen
Med J Aust 2010; 193 (1): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03753.x
Published online: 5 July 2010

In reply: Professor Shann raises three issues regarding the recommendation for 24 hours’ prophylaxis for cardiac surgery. First, he states that the trial1 on which this recommendation was made was flawed, because “cephazolin was not given until 20–30 minutes after induction of anaesthesia, which is likely to have been too late”. The trial included patients having coronary artery surgery and/or cardiac valve replacement, and, for these procedures, the time between induction of anaesthesia and surgical incision is about 60–75 minutes, as patients require the placement of intravenous lines and preparation for coronary artery bypass surgery. Antibiotic administration is recommended 30–60 minutes before incision, thus, administration 30 minutes after induction provides optimal serum concentrations at incision, in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Second, the per-protocol analysis is perhaps less than ideal, but the demographics, clinical characteristics and operative data were comparable for the patients included in the analysis. Third, as stated by Professor Shann, the three earlier studies2-4 were either very small or flawed in design. The McDonald systematic review5 included 28 studies, only two of which were on cardiac surgery, both being the earlier flawed studies2,3 quoted above.


  • PathWest Laboratory Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA.



Competing interests:

I am a member of the writing committee for Therapeutic guidelines: antibiotic and have reviewed the chapter on surgical prophylaxis for the 2010 version.

  • 1. Tamayo E, Gualis J, Flórez S, et al. Comparative study of single-dose and 24-hour multiple-dose antibiotic prophylaxis for cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008; 136: 1522-1527.
  • 2. Conte JE, Cohen SN, Roe BB, Elashoff RM. Antibiotic prophylaxis and cardiac surgery. A prospective double-blind comparison of single-dose versus multiple-dose regimens. Ann Intern Med 1972; 76: 943-949.
  • 3. Nooyen SM, Overbeek BP, Brutel de la Rivière A, et al. Prospective randomised comparison of single-dose versus multiple-dose cefuroxime for prophylaxis in coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1994; 13: 1033-1037.
  • 4. Austin TW, Coles JC, Burnett R, Goldbach M. Aortocoronary bypass procedures and sternotomy infections: a study of antistaphylococcal prophylaxis. Can J Surg 1980; 23: 483-485.
  • 5. McDonald M, Grabsch E, Marshall C, Forbes A. Single- versus multiple-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis for major surgery: a systematic review. ANZ J Surg 1998; 68: 388-396.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.