Connect
MJA
MJA

Immigration detention and health

Christine B Phillips
Med J Aust 2010; 192 (2): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03417.x
Published online: 18 January 2010

On health grounds, immigration detention should be used in very limited ways

Like all rich nations, Australia has experienced an increase in people crossing its national borders without the documents authorising them to do so. Since 1992, Australia has had a policy of mandatory detention for these people. About a third of the people in immigration detention are asylum seekers who are requesting sanctuary under the 1951 United Nations Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, to which Australia was an early signatory. Although some form of immigration detention exists in most developed countries, asylum seekers are generally released into the community after a period of time in detention, while their claims are being processed. Australia pioneered the notion that detention for asylum seekers was a kind of endgame, in which people arriving without authority stayed in detention until they obtained a visa or were deported. Among the Convention signatories, no other nation has followed suit.


  • Academic Unit of General Practice and Community Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT.



  • 1. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Unauthorised arrivals and overstayers. Chapter 5. Year Book Australia, 2002: 93. http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/1301.02002?OpenDocument (accessed Sep 2009).
  • 2. Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs. Output 1-3 Enforcement of immigration law. Annual report 2000–01. http://www.immi.gov.au/about/reports/annual/2000-01/report19.htm (accessed Sep 2009).
  • 3. Flood P. Report of inquiry into immigration detention procedures. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2001.
  • 4. Green JP, Eagar K. The health of people in Australian immigration detention centres. Med J Aust 2010; 192: 65-70.
  • 5. Silove D, Steel Z, Watters C. Policies of deterrence and the mental health of asylum seekers. JAMA 2000; 284: 604-611.
  • 6. Sultan A, O’Sullivan K. Psychological disturbances in asylum seekers held in long term detention: a participant–observer account. Med J Aust 2001; 175: 593-596. <MJA full text>
  • 7. Steel Z, Silove D, Brooks R, et al. Impact of immigration detention and temporary protection on the mental health of refugees. Br J Psychiatry 2006; 188: 58-64.
  • 8. Steel Z, Momartin S, Bateman C, et al. Psychiatric status of asylum seeker families held for a protracted period in a remote detention centre in Australia. Aust N Z J Public Health 2004; 28: 527-536.
  • 9. Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission. A last resort? The national inquiry into children in immigration detention. Sydney: HREOC, Apr 2004.
  • 10. Briskman L, Latham S, Goddard C. Human rights overboard. Seeking asylum in Australia. Melbourne: Scribe, 2008.
  • 11. Department of Immigration and Citizenship. Immigration detention statistics summary. http://www.immi.gov.au/managing-australias-borders/detention/facilities/statistics/ (accessed Oct 2009).
  • 12. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement. ICE fact sheet: 2009 Immigration detention reforms. Washington, DC: ICE, 6 Aug 2009. http://www.ice.gov/pi/news/factsheets/2009_immigration_detention_reforms.htm (accessed Sep 2009).

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.