Connect
MJA
MJA

Practitioner-supported delivery of internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy: evaluation of the feasibility of conducting a cluster randomised trial

Ian B Hickie, Tracey A Davenport, Georgina M Luscombe, Michael Moore, Kathleen M Griffiths and Helen Christensen
Med J Aust 2010; 192 (11 Suppl): S31.

Summary

Objective: To determine the feasibility of conducting a cluster randomised trial in Australia of the effectiveness of general practitioner-supported delivery of internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) and enhanced psychological care.

Design, setting and participants: Cluster randomised trial involving patients attending general practices in Australia. Participating practices were randomly allocated to interventions. The study was conducted between January 2004 and January 2007.

Interventions: Enhanced GP care was delivered by doctors who had completed specific mental health training; the experimental condition consisted of enhanced GP care plus MoodGYM, an internet-based CBT intervention.

Main outcome measures: Demographic and behavioural characteristics of patients, and demographic and practice characteristics of GPs; time to resolution of psychological symptoms for patients involved in the longitudinal phase of the trial.

Results: 1571 patients attending 90 GPs from 84 general practices were identified as potentially suitable for recruitment. These patients had a mean age of 35 years, 76% were female, 84% had access to the internet for personal use, and 22% reported high or very high levels of psychological distress on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale. The 90 GPs had a mean age of 49 years, 53% were female and 25% had completed formal mental health training. Of the 1571 screened patients, 340 reported high levels of psychological distress, but only 140 of these could be further assessed for eligibility in the trial. Of these 140, 83 patients with depression (attending 10 GPs in eight general practices) proceeded to randomisation. For these patients, the experimental intervention (enhanced GP care plus MoodGYM) tended to result in prompt and more sustained resolution of depressive symptoms.

Conclusion: Our capacity to conduct a definitive trial was limited by available resources. Preliminary data suggest that primary care patients with depression may derive additional benefits from an internet-based CBT program delivered in conjunction with enhanced psychological care from GPs.

  • Ian B Hickie1
  • Tracey A Davenport1
  • Georgina M Luscombe1
  • Michael Moore2
  • Kathleen M Griffiths3
  • Helen Christensen3

  • 1 Brain & Mind Research Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.
  • 2 Central Sydney Division of General Practice, Sydney, NSW.
  • 3 Centre for Mental Health Research, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT.

Correspondence: ianh@med.usyd.edu.au

Acknowledgements: 

The MoodGYM GP trial (chief investigators: Helen Christensen, Kathleen Griffiths, Ian Hickie and Michael Moore) was funded by the Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing. The research was also supported by National Health and Medical Research Council Principal Research Fellowships 148947 and 366781. We are grateful to Zoe Richards, Wendy Rees and Andrea Fogarty for their research assistance with the study.

Competing interests:

Helen Christensen and Kathleen Griffiths are the developers of the MoodGYM website.

  • 1. Australian Bureau of Statistics. National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing: summary of results, 2007. Canberra: ABS, 2008. (ABS Cat. No. 4326.0.) http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/mf/4326.0 (accessed Jun 2009).
  • 2. Christensen H. Computerised therapy for psychiatric disorders. Lancet 2007; 370: 112-113.
  • 3. Perini S, Titov N, Andrews G. Clinician-assisted Internet-based treatment is effective for depression: randomized controlled trial. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2009; 43: 571-578.
  • 4. MoodGYM [website]. http://moodgym.anu. edu.au (accessed Jun 2009).
  • 5. Christensen H, Griffiths KM, Korten A. Web-based cognitive behavior therapy: analysis of site usage and changes in depression and anxiety scores. J Med Internet Res 2002; 4: e3.
  • 6. Christensen H, Griffiths KM, Jorm AF. Delivering interventions for depression by using the internet: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2004; 328: 265.
  • 7. O’Kearney R, Kang K, Christensen H, Griffiths K. A controlled trial of a school-based Internet program for reducing depressive symptoms in adolescent girls. Depress Anxiety 2009; 26: 65-72.
  • 8. Hickie IB, Davenport TA, Naismith SL, et al. Treatment of common mental disorders in Australian general practice. Med J Aust 2001; 175 (2 Suppl): S25-S30.
  • 9. Burgess PM, Pirkis JE, Slade TN, et al. Service use for mental health problems: findings from the 2007 National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2009; 43: 615-623.
  • 10. Titov N, Andrews G, Johnston L, et al. Shyness programme: longer term benefits, cost-effectiveness, and acceptability. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2009; 43: 36-44.
  • 11. Hickie IB, Pirkis JE, Blashki GA, et al. General practitioners’ response to depression and anxiety in the Australian community: a preliminary analysis. Med J Aust 2004; 181 (7 Suppl): S15-S20. <MJA full text>
  • 12. Hickie IB, McGorry PD. Increased access to evidence-based primary mental health care: will the implementation match the rhetoric? Med J Aust 2007; 187: 100-103. <MJA full text>
  • 13. Hickie I, Scott E, Ricci C, et al. Treating depression and anxiety in general practice: training manual. Sydney: Educational Health Solutions, 1998.
  • 14. Naismith SL, Hickie IB, Scott EM, Davenport TA. Effects of mental health training and clinical audit on general practitioners’ management of common mental disorders. Med J Aust 2001; 175 (2 Suppl): S42-S47.
  • 15. Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ, et al. Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychol Med 2002; 32: 959-976.
  • 16. Hickie IB, Davenport TA, Hadzi-Pavlovic D, et al. Development of a simple screening tool for common mental disorders in general practice. Med J Aust 2001; 175 (2 Suppl): S10-S17.
  • 17. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Information paper: use of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale in ABS health surveys, Australia, 2001. Canberra: ABS, 2003. (ABS Cat. No. 4817.0.55.001.) http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/4817.0.55.001 (accessed Jun 2009).
  • 18. Von Korff M, Ustun TB, Ormel J, et al. Self-report disability in an international primary care study of psychological illness. J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49: 297-303.
  • 19. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
  • 20. Anderson WP, Papadakis EM. Research to improve health practice and policy. Med J Aust 2009; 191: 646-647. <MJA full text>
  • 21. Mitchell RJ, McClure RJ, Olivier J, Watson WL. Rational allocation of Australia’s research dollars: does the distribution of NHMRC funding by National Health Priority Area reflect actual disease burden? Med J Aust 2009; 191: 648-652. <MJA full text>
  • 22. Perini S, Titov N, Andrews G. The Climate Sadness program: an open trial of Internet-based treatment for depression. E-J Appl Psychol 2008; 4 (2): 18-24.
  • 23. Rosenberg S, Hickie IB, Mendoza J. National mental health reform: less talk, more action. Med J Aust 2009; 190: 193-195. <MJA full text>

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Responses are now closed for this article.