Peer physical examination: time to revisit?

Suzanne Outram
Med J Aust 2009; 190 (6): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2009.tb02437.x
Published online: 16 March 2009

In reply: Marley states that consent for peer physical examination “always contains elements of coercion”. It could be argued that this applies equally to medical practice and research, as one can never be 100% sure that participants have not felt some coercion. The ethical imperative is to balance the issues, to gain the best outcome.

  • Suzanne Outram

  • School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW.



remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.