Volume 190 - Issue 4

What can alert the general practitioner to people whose common mental health problems are unrecognised?

Author:  Marjan Kljakovic

Med J Aust 2009; 190 (4): 221. || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2009.tb02360.x
Published online: 16 February 2009

To the Editor: Wilhelm and colleagues falsely concluded in their recent study that general practitioners in metropolitan Sydney and rural New South Wales had a low rate of recognition of psychological problems overall.1 Furthermore, Wilhelm et al took GPs’ judgements of the presence of psychological problems as the benchmark for “caseness” because of the difference between GP practice and psychiatric practice in the process of assessing psychological problems in consultation. My disagreement lies with what the researchers meant by “overall” and by “caseness”.

The rate of recognition of caseness of psychological problems by GPs will vary according to the nature of the cases under consideration. In their study, Wilhelm et al found that they had complete data on 76% of their patients. Our work in New Zealand found that a major variable that influenced diagnostic behaviour within consultations was the frequency with which patients had previously consulted their GP.2 The more frequently the patient had been seen in the previous year, the more likely the GP was to diagnose a mental disorder. A second variable found in our research was the presence or absence of disability in the patient.3 GPs were less sensitive to the presence of mental disorders if there was little concomitant disability, and in sub-threshold cases, the presence of disability increased the chance of GPs identifying clinically significant symptoms.

In general practice, the “new patient” is a different kind of case than the frequent attendee. Similarly, a patient diagnosed with depression who is seriously disabled is a different kind of case to the more common kind found in general practice — namely, a patient diagnosed with depression but with little or no disability. It would not be surprising if Wilhelm et al were to find that among the 20% of patients overall in whom GPs identified psychological problems, many were “typical cases” seen by GPs — namely, frequent attendees and those with disability.


Author


References