To the Editor: The federal government is to be applauded for its decision to re-introduce the “alcopops” tax Bill to Parliament and to try to retain the $300 million raised so far for expenditure on services, programs and research to reduce alcohol-related harm in Australia. The alcopops tax was paid by consumers in the form of higher retail prices, which will fall dramatically if the government again fails to pass legislation to retain the tax.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1 School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC.
- 2 School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW.
- 3 National Drug Research Institute, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, WA.
- 4 Australasian Faculty of Public Health Medicine, Darwin, NT.
- 5 Australasian Faculty of Public Health Medicine, Sydney, NSW.
Correspondence: petermiller.mail@gmail.com
- 1. Shanahan L, Murphy K. Alcopop refunds to be donated. The Age (Melbourne) 2009; 20 Mar. http://www.theage.com.au/national/alcopop-refunds-to-be-donated-20090319-93fw.html (accessed Apr 2009).
- 2. Hall WD, Room R. Assessing the wisdom of funding DrinkWise [editorial]. Med J Aust 2006; 185: 635-636. <MJA full text>
- 3. Bond L, Daube M, Chikritzhs T. Access to confidential alcohol industry documents: from ‘Big Tobacco’ to ‘Big Booze’. AMJ 2009; 1 (3): 1-26. doi: 10.4066/AMJ.2009.43 (accessed Apr 2009).
- 4. Miller P, Kypri K. Why we will not accept funding from DrinkWise. Drug Alcohol Rev 2009; 28: 324-326.
- 5. Anderson P, Baumberg B. Alcohol in Europe: a public health perspective. A report for the European Commission. London: Institute of Alcohol Studies, 2006. http://ec.europa.eu/health-eu/doc/alcoholineu_content_en.pdf (accessed Apr 2009).
- 6. Miller N. Big booze book of tactics exposed. The Age (Melbourne) 2009; 22 Apr. http://www.theage.com.au/national/big-booze-book-of-tactics-exposed-20090421-ae3e.html (accessed Apr 2009).
- 7. Wagenaar AC, Salois MJ, Komro KA. Effects of beverage alcohol price and tax levels on drinking: a meta-analysis of 1003 estimates from 112 studies. Addiction 2009; 104: 179-190.
- 8. Grossman M, Chaloupka FJ, Saffer H, Laixuthai A. Effects of alcohol price policy on youth: a summary of economic research. J Res Adolesc 1994; 4: 347-364.
- 9. Collins DJ, Lapsley HM. The avoidable costs of alcohol abuse in Australia and the potential benefits of effective policies to reduce the social costs of alcohol. National Drug Strategy Monograph Series No. 70. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, 2008. http://www.nationaldrugstrategy.gov.au/internet/drugstrategy/publishing.nsf/Content/0A14D387E42 AA201CA2574B3000028A8/$File/mono70.pdf (accessed Apr 2009).
- 10. Skov SJ; Royal Australasian College of Physicians Alcohol Advisory Group. Alcohol taxation policy in Australia: public health imperatives for action. Med J Aust 2009; 190: 437-439. [Published online ahead of print 16 Mar 2009.] <MJA full text>
- 11. Babor T, Caetano R, Casswell S, et al. Alcohol: no ordinary commodity — research and public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
- 12. Loxley W, Toumbourou JW, Stockwell T, et al. The prevention of substance use, risk and harm in Australia: a review of the evidence. Perth: National Drug Research Institute, Curtin University of Technology and the Centre for Adolescent Health, 2004. http://espace.library.curtin.edu.au/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=19135&local_base=GEN01 (accessed Apr 2009).
- 13. Miller P, Kypri K, Chikritzhs T, et al. Health experts reject industry-backed funding for alcohol research. 7 May 2009. http://alcopopstatement.orgfree.com (accessed May 2009). (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/5gbwQWf9J.)
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.