Objective: To identify the prevalence and correlates of three types of pelvic pain (dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia, and other chronic pelvic pain [CPP]) in a nationally representative sample of Australian women.
Design and setting: The CPP survey was part of a broader national study of health and relationships. Computer-assisted telephone interviews were administered to a random sample of 8656 Australian households; 4366 women aged between 16 and 64 years were interviewed in 2004 and 2005. Eighteen of the more than 200 potential survey questions related to pelvic pain.
Results: Data on 1983 women aged 16–49 years who were still menstruating and sexually active were analysed. Prevalences were 71.7% for dysmenorrhoea, 14.1% for dyspareunia and 21.5% for other CPP; 23.3% of women reported no pelvic pain of any kind. Severe pain was reported by 15.0% (95% CI, 13.0%–17.1%) of women with dysmenorrhoea, 7.8% (95% CI, 5.0%–11.9%) of women with dyspareunia and 20.0% (95% CI, 16.1%–24.6%) of women with other CPP. Just over a third (34.2%) of women who reported any pain had sought advice from a health professional. Women reporting CPP were also likely to report other health conditions, most notably depression and anxiety. There were clear associations between CPP and sexual difficulties, pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes.
Conclusions: Rates of pelvic pain in Australian women are high. General practitioners need to be ready to discuss these issues with patients, particularly in relation to underlying anxiety and depression.
A recent systematic review by the World Health Organization identified chronic pelvic pain (CPP) as an important cause of morbidity in women, but noted that the condition is relatively neglected because of the paucity of basic epidemiological data.1
There have been few population-based studies of CPP. A United States study reported a CPP prevalence of 14.7% among women aged 18–50 years,2 but the study excluded mid cycle period pain. Two other studies that did include mid cycle pain, one in the United Kingdom and the other in New Zealand, reported CPP prevalences of 24% and 25.4%, respectively.3,4 A recent systematic review evaluating 54 risk factors for dysmenorrhoea identified a number of factors associated with dysmenorrhoea, including age (< 30 years), low body mass index, smoking, early menarche, long menstrual cycles, heavy menstrual flow, nulliparity, premenstrual syndrome, sterilisation, clinically suspected pelvic inflammatory disease, sexual abuse and psychological symptoms.5 There was an inverse relationship between dysmenorrhoea and younger age at first childbirth, exercise, and the use of oral contraceptives. In the same study, menopause, pelvic inflammatory disease, sexual abuse, anxiety and depression were found to be associated with dyspareunia. Drug or alcohol misuse, miscarriage, heavy menstrual flow, pelvic inflammatory disease, previous caesarean section, pelvic pathology, abuse, and psychological comorbidity were associated with an increased risk of non-cyclical pelvic pain.
The Australian Longitudinal Study of Health and Relationships is a representative population-based survey of the sexual health behaviour, attitudes and knowledge of the Australian population. It is based on a random sample of Australians aged 16–64 years who completed a computer-assisted telephone interview. The first annual data collection panel was conducted in 2004–2005. A sample of 8656 households was drawn using random-digit dialling, as described in an earlier study.6 In half of the sample households, a woman was selected. Where possible, phone numbers were matched with addresses in the electronic White Pages phone directory, and an introductory letter detailing the study was posted to households. Otherwise, respondents were informed of the nature of the study over the phone. Before being interviewed, participants provided informed consent. If more than one household member was eligible, a single participant was chosen at random by a computer-generated algorithm. Prevalence data for our study come from the first panel of interviews.
Our report on pelvic pain in women is based on a subset of data gathered for the broader longitudinal study of health and relationships. The subset comprised sexually active women between the ages of 16 and 49 years, interviewed in 2004 and 2005. Of the more than 200 potential survey questions, 18 related to pelvic pain.
Women were asked whether or not they had experienced pain in the pelvic region (dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia, or any other pelvic pain not associated with sexual intercourse or menstruation) during the previous 12 months. Pelvic pain was defined as “any type of pain in the lower part of your belly — that is, from your belly button down”. Three subtypes of pelvic pain where defined as follows:
Dysmenorrhoea was defined as “pelvic pain with periods, including irregular bleeding while on the pill or on hormone replacement therapy”;
Dyspareunia was defined as “pelvic pain during or in the 24 hours after intercourse”; and
Other CPP was defined as “pelvic pain not occurring with periods or intercourse, either on and off or constantly”.
Women who were eligible for our study were those aged between 16 and 49 years who reported menstruating in the previous 12 months and were sexually active. In line with earlier studies,2,4 women aged 50 years or over were excluded because of the potential confounding effects of menopause. Women who were currently pregnant (n = 106*) or who had been pregnant in the previous 12 months (n = 269*) were also excluded. (* Note that all counts, here and elsewhere, were weighted for each sex with respect to household size and rounded to the nearest integer.)
As the three CPP outcomes were dichotomous (yes/no) variables, logistic regression models were used, with all exploratory variables (eg, age, rurality, sexual history and pregnancy outcomes) entered individually. Analyses for the three outcomes variables were performed separately, with adjustment for age in each model. Data were analysed using Stata software, version 10 (StataCorp, College Station, Tex, USA) and the program’s survey-based function. Confidence levels for the odds ratios were set at 95%.
We interviewed 4366 women, representing a response rate of 57% for female participants. Results presented here relate to the 1983 women between the ages of 16 and 49 years who reported menstruating in the previous 12 months and who were sexually active.
Prevalences of the three types of CPP were 71.7% (n = 1421) for dysmenorrhoea, 14.1% (n = 279) for dyspareunia, and 21.5% (n = 427) for other CPP. Only 23.3% (n = 462) of our sample reported no pelvic pain of any kind (Box 1). Box 1 also shows the overlap between dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia and other CPP.
Different kinds of pelvic pain were experienced with differing degrees of severity. Severe pain was reported by 15.0% (95% CI, 13.0%–17.1%) of women with dysmenorrhoea, 7.8% (95% CI, 5.0%–11.9%) of women with dyspareunia, and 20.0% (95% CI, 16.1%–24.6%) of women with pelvic pain not associated with dyspareunia or dysmenorrhoea. Of women who reported dyspareunia, more than half (54.5%) reported it as only slight or mild. In contrast, of women who reported other CPP, 38.3% reported it as only slight or mild. Just over a third of women (34.2%) who reported any type of pelvic pain had sought advice from a health professional.
An age effect was observed for women reporting dysmenorrhoea and dyspareunia but not other CPP (Box 2): compared with women aged 40–49 years, women in younger age groups were significantly more likely to report dysmenorrhoea or dyspareunia. However, a test of the changes in the proportion of women experiencing pelvic pain across the age range was not significant. Given the pronounced age effect for dysmenorrhoea and dyspareunia observed in previous research, we controlled for respondents’ age in all further analyses.
Women reporting dysmenorrhoea were more likely to speak English at home than women without dysmenorrhoea. Women reporting dyspareunia were more likely to have an educational attainment of secondary school level or less. Among women reporting other CPP, there were no significant demographic differences (Box 2).
Compared with women who had no pelvic pain, women with any type of pelvic pain were more likely to report having some form of sexual difficulty for at least a month during the previous 12 months (Box 3). For example, women in all three groups were significantly more likely to have experienced physical pain during sex and/or a lack of interest in sex during the previous 12 months; and women with dyspareunia or other CPP were significantly more likely to report anxiety about sex and/or vaginal dryness. Women reporting dyspareunia were more likely to be unable to achieve orgasm, and experienced more sexual difficulties than other women overall.
Compared with women with no pelvic pain, those reporting dyspareunia (but not the other types of CPP) were significantly more likely to have had sex during the 4 weeks prior to the interview and were more likely to have had sex more frequently (Box 3).
Women who reported dysmenorrhoea were significantly less likely to be using oral contraception or any form of contraception (data not shown). Women reporting dyspareunia or other CPP were significantly more likely to have ever used emergency contraception.
Relationships between pregnancy outcomes and the three types of CPP are summarised in Box 4. Compared with women who had never been pregnant, those who had ever been pregnant were significantly less likely to report dysmenorrhoea but more likely to report dyspareunia. There was no significant association between pregnancy and other CPP. Women who had had a live birth or a termination were significantly less likely to report dysmenorrhoea.
Compared to women with no dyspareunia, women reporting dyspareunia were significantly more likely to have had two or more pregnancies and to have had a miscarriage or termination. The data suggest that women who have had two or more terminations are more likely to experience dyspareunia. For women reporting other CPP there were no significant patterns of association with pregnancy history (Box 4).
A number of lifestyle and health conditions were analysed for associations with pelvic pain (data not shown). Women who had ever been diagnosed with depression or who had experienced a lot of anxiety over the previous 4 weeks were significantly more likely to report any form of pelvic pain. (As the anxiety question included depression as one of the options for emotional problems, depression was added as a covariate to mediate any collinear effects.)
Women reporting dysmenorrhoea were significantly more likely to be a current drinker, and women who reported dyspareunia were more likely to have a heart condition and to be a current smoker. Women reporting other CPP were significantly more likely to have a heart condition.
The key finding of our study was the high prevalence of the three types of pelvic pain, with only one in four participants reporting no pelvic pain. With 71.7% of women reporting dysmenorrhoea, this condition can clearly be considered to be the norm for Australian women.
As observed in previous studies,2,4 we found a significant association between age and pelvic pain, with women aged 40–49 years reporting lower prevalences of dysmenorrhoea and dyspareunia than younger women. The 83.8% prevalence of dysmenorrhoea among women aged 16–19 years in our study was similar to the 80% prevalence noted in a Western Australian study of female senior secondary students.8 More than one in five women (21.5%) in our study reported other CPP, which is similar to the 24% reported by Zondervan et al3 in the UK and the 25.4% reported by Grace and Zondervan4 in NZ. However, Zondervan and colleagues sampled from a community clinic and Grace and Zondervan used a postal survey. Both methods may include a response bias towards women interested in, or relating to, CPP. By contrast, our survey incorporated many different aspects of health and wellbeing, of which pelvic pain was just one aspect.
Physical pain during intercourse and lack of interest in sex were commonly reported among all three groups of women in our survey. Those reporting dyspareunia had the most sexual difficulties — in spite of (or perhaps partly because of) the fact that they were more likely to report having sex during the previous 4 weeks and to report having more frequent sex than women without dyspareunia.
For women in our study, the overall prevalence of dyspareunia was 14.1%. This is higher than the 9.3% prevalence found in women attending a cervical screening program in Sweden.9 Although a direct comparison between our study and the Swedish study was not possible for all individual age groups, for women aged 20–29 years, the prevalence was 16.7% in our study compared with 13% in the Swedish study.
Strengths of our study were its large sample size and wide age range. Additionally, the sample was population-based rather than clinic-based. Potential weaknesses included the reliance on self-report and the relatively low response rate. In mitigation of the low response rate, it is noteworthy that the prevalences of most key outcomes in sexual and reproductive health in our study were almost exactly the same as those reported in the previous national Australian study, which had a 73% response rate (data not shown).6
Our findings lend further support to the findings of a review by Latthe et al of factors predisposing women to CPP.1 That review pointed to the inter-relationship between risk factors — for example, that a history of abuse is strongly associated with depression, and that both factors are, in turn, associated with CPP. Given the longitudinal nature of our study, analysis of further waves of data may shed light on the nature of causal relationships between these and other risk factors. Only a quarter of the studies evaluated by Latthe et al1 (which were predominantly case–control studies) examined the temporal relationship between risk factors and CPP. Further areas in need of research include a comprehensive understanding of the natural history of pelvic pain and strategies for its effective treatment and management.
In conclusion, rates of pelvic pain in Australia are high. Yet our findings suggest that only about a third of women who experience CPP seek advice from a health professional. General practitioners need to be aware of the prevalence of different types of CPP and to be ready to discuss these issues with patients, particularly in relation to underlying anxiety and depression.
1 Prevalence of dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia and other chronic pelvic pain (CPP) among 1983 women over a 12-month period*
2 Demographic correlates of three types of pelvic pain
CPP = chronic pelvic pain. OR = odds ratio. * Numbers were weighted for each sex with respect to household size and rounded to the nearest integer. † ORs were adjusted for age. ‡ An example of how to interpret percentages in table: 83.8% of the 159 women aged 16–19 years responded “yes” to the question of whether they had experienced dysmenorrhoea during the previous 12 months. § Reference category. ¶ In a heterosexual relationship currently or within previous 12 months. ** Based on the Australian Standard Geographical Classification.7
3 Sexual difficulty correlates of three types of pelvic pain
4 Pregnancy outcome correlates of three types of pelvic pain
Received 10 July 2007, accepted 2 March 2008
- 1. Latthe P, Latthe M, Say L, et al. WHO systematic review of prevalence of chronic pelvic pain: a neglected reproductive health morbidity. BMC Public Health 2006; 6: 177.
- 2. Mathias SD, Kuppermann M, Liberman RF, et al. Chronic pelvic pain: prevalence, health-related quality of life, and economic correlates. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87: 321-327.
- 3. Zondervan KT, Yudkin PL, Vessey MP, et al. The community prevalence of chronic pelvic pain in women and associated illness behaviour. Br J Gen Pract 2001; 51: 541-547.
- 4. Grace VM, Zondervan KT. Chronic pelvic pain in New Zealand: prevalence, pain severity, diagnoses and use of the health services. Aust N Z J Public Health 2004; 28: 369-375.
- 5. Latthe P, Mignini L, Gray R, et al. Factors predisposing women to chronic pelvic pain: systematic review. BMJ 2006; 332: 749-755.
- 6. Smith AM, Rissel CE, Richters J, et al. Sex in Australia: the rationale and methods of the Australian study of health and relationships. Aust N Z J Public Health 2003; 27: 106-117.
- 7. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Australian Standard Geographical Classification (ASGC). Canberra: ABS, 2005. (ABS Cat. No. 1216.0.) http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/lookup/0D204FD3DCD90564CA256F19001 303A2?opendocument (accessed Jul 2008)
- 8. Hillen TI, Grbavac SL, Johnston PJ, et al. Primary dysmenorrhea in young Western Australian women: prevalence, impact, and knowledge of treatment. J Adolesc Health 1999; 25: 40-45.
- 9. Danielsson I, Sjöberg I, Stenlund H, Wikman M. Prevalence and incidence of prolonged and severe dyspareunia in women: results from a population study. Scand J Public Health 2003; 31: 113-118.
Publication of your online response is subject to the Medical Journal of Australia's editorial discretion. You will be notified by email within five working days should your response be accepted.