Prostate cancer screening and bacteraemia

Francis J Bowden, Jan Roberts and Peter J Collignon
Med J Aust 2008; 188 (1): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb01513.x
Published online: 7 January 2008

To the Editor: Prostate cancer screening remains controversial. There is currently a lack of evidence that treating prostate cancers identified by screening leads to prolonged survival,1 and the main screening test (serum prostate-specific antigen [PSA] concentration) has poor sensitivity and specificity. Patients with an elevated PSA level usually undergo a transrectal ultrasound-guided (TRUS) prostate biopsy for definitive diagnosis. TRUS biopsy is associated with risks that include bleeding, urinary tract infections, prostatitis and bacteraemia. Infective complications can occur even when prophylactic antibiotics are administered.2 Gram-negative bacteraemia is usually associated with a mortality rate of at least 5%.3

  • Francis J Bowden1
  • Jan Roberts2
  • Peter J Collignon2

  • 1 Academic Unit of Internal Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra Hospital, Canberra, ACT.
  • 2 Infectious Diseases Unit and Microbiology Department, Canberra Hospital, Canberra, ACT.



remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.