Connect
MJA
MJA

Acupuncture for persistent allergic rhinitis: a randomised, sham-controlled trial

Edzard Ernst
Med J Aust 2008; 188 (1): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb01519.x
Published online: 7 January 2008

To the Editor: Xue and colleagues reported an interesting randomised, single-blind trial of acupuncture for persistent allergic rhinitis (PAR) and concluded that acupuncture is an effective treatment for this condition.1 I am not entirely sure that this is true. The authors state that “once needling sensation (known as de-qi) was obtained, the needles were manipulated . . .”. In the sham group they inserted needles at non-acupuncture points where, according to acupuncture theory, no de-qi can be elicited. Thus the intervention patients were experiencing de-qi, and the control patients were not. This means that neither the patients nor the therapist were blinded. Consequently, the difference in outcome between the two groups could be unrelated to acupuncture itself, and caused by patient expectation, therapist expectation or both.


  • Complementary Medicine, Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter and Plymouth, Exeter, UK.


Correspondence: Edzard.Ernst@pms.ac.uk

  • 1. Xue CCL, An X, Cheung TP, et al. Acupuncture for persistent allergic rhinitis: a randomised, sham-controlled trial. Med J Aust 2007; 187: 337-341. <MJA full text>
  • 2. Ernst E, Pittler MH, Wider B, Boddy K. The desktop guide to complementary and alternative medicine. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier Mosby, 2006.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.