The media and prostate cancer screening

Suzanne K Steginga and Robert (aka Frank) A Gardiner
Med J Aust 2007; 187 (9): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb01387.x
Published online: 5 November 2007

Provision of incorrect information or incorrect data interpretation does not serve anyone well

In this issue of the Journal, MacKenzie and colleagues present data to show that, over an 18-month period, media reports about prostate cancer were dominated by statements emphasising Australian men’s risk of prostate cancer, encouraging screening for early detection, and providing reassurance about side effects for treatments that emphasise emerging technologies (→ "The news is [not] all good": misrepresentations and inaccuracies in Australian news media reports on prostate cancer screening).1 In particular, they draw attention to rhetoric that unequivocally supports screening, which would seem to be irresponsible, given the lack of definitive data to show that population-based screening will reduce mortality.

  • Suzanne K Steginga1,2
  • Robert (aka Frank) A Gardiner3,4

  • 1 The Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, QLD.
  • 2 Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD.
  • 3 University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD.
  • 4 Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD.



remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.