Volume 187 - Issue 7
Spirituality and health
Author: Martin B Van Der Weyden
Med J Aust 2007; 187 (7): 423-424. || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb01325.x
Published online: 1 October 2007
Published online: 1 October 2007
In reply: The MJA’s spirituality and health supplement has reawakened the long-standing tension between supporters of science and supporters of spirituality, and I welcome their conflicting and unaccommodating views. The barrage of letters received reflects a perceived incongruity between spirituality and evidence-based medicine, with its requirement for evidence that is controlled, measured, counted and analysed by statistical methods.1 But the task of physicians has always been to understand not only the disease but also the patient. And for some patients, religion and spirituality are important — or, indeed, central — to their lives and health. The purpose of the supplement was to explore this area.
Jackson is perturbed that, in publishing the supplement, the Journal has sold its scientific soul. However, one of the goals of the Journal is to provide a scholarly forum for continuing education and informed debate on standards of clinical practice, ethics, and social, legal and other issues related to health care in Australia.2
While it must be acknowledged that religion and spirituality involve areas of knowledge not governed by the scientific method, it would be intellectually dishonest to refuse to consider any role for spirituality in health care.
Jackson also alleges that the supplement fails to satisfy the Journal’s policy on sponsored supplements, but proffers no evidence. In fact, the supplement complies completely with our policy for such publications.3
Despite the ongoing conflict between science and spirituality, exploration of the latter is increasingly considered for inclusion in modern medical curricula.
References
- Malterud K. The art and science of clinical knowledge: evidence beyond measures and numbers. Lancet 2001; 358: 397-400.<eMJA full text>
- Van Der Weyden MB. From the Editor’s Desk . . . the Journal [editorial]. Med J Aust 1995; 162: 344.
- Van Der Weyden MB. In reply: You oughta be congratulated [letter]? Med J Aust 2002; 177: 400. 0_i1091816
Shifting focus to adolescent wellbeing and inclusive participation in the digital age
Allyson R Todd, Elena Wang, Stephanie R Partridge
The clinical presentation, investigation, and management of women diagnosed with endometriosis in Australian general practices, 2011–2021: an open cohort study
Danielle Mazza, Kailash Thapaliya, Sharinne B Crawford, Alissia Hui, Maryam Moradi, Luke E Grzeskowiak
The impact of the Breast Screen NSW transition from film to digital mammography, 2002–2016: a linked population health data analysis
Rachel Farber, Nehmat Houssami, Katy J L Bell
Non‐technical errors associated with deaths in surgical care, Australia, 2012–2019, by surgical specialty (Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality): a retrospective cohort study
Jesse Ey, Victoria Kollias, Octavia Lee, Kelly Hou, Matheesha Herath, John B North, Ellie Treloar, Suzanne Edwards, Martin Bruening, Adam J Wells, Guy J Maddern
The CURE Asthma roadmap
Gary P Anderson, Anthony Flynn, Phil G Bardin, John D Blakey, Shyamali C Dharmage, Paul Foster, Peter G Gibson, Adam Jaffe, Alan James, Christine R Jenkins, Sundram Sivamalai, Peter D Sly, Guy B Marks, Vanessa M McDonald, Judy Wetttenhall
Evidence from Australian cohort studies about asthma trajectories and transitions across the life course: a narrative review
Caroline Lodge, Xin Dai, Ingrid A. Laing, Michael P Menden, Anthony Flynn, Gary P Anderson, Sarath Ranganathan, Shyamali C Dharmage