Connect
MJA
MJA

Performance monitoring in Australia and England: from scandals to action

Mohammed A Mohammed and Andrew J Stevens
Med J Aust 2007; 187 (10): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb01413.x
Published online: 19 November 2007

The Queensland approach may deliver empirical evidence on whether performance monitoring leads to improved quality of care

Several high profile medical disasters have occurred recently in Australia and England and have raised concern about quality of care and patient safety. In Australia, the major disasters have included those at the Bundaberg Hospital in Queensland,1 and the Campbelltown and Camden Hospitals in New South Wales; and in England, the Bristol Royal Infirmary scandal2 and the Shipman Affair.3 Although the specifics in each instance are unique, a common outcome from the subsequent inquiries has been a recommendation for some form of centralised performance monitoring using routinely collected data. Why? Because retrospective desktop analysis of routinely collected data signalled the medical disaster before the “whistle blew”.


  • Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.


Correspondence: m.a.mohammed@bham.ac.uk

  • 1. Van Der Weyden MB. The Bundaberg Hospital scandal: the need for reform in Queensland and beyond [editorial]. Med J Aust 2005; 183: 284-285. <MJA full text>
  • 2. Smith R. One Bristol, but there could have been many [editorial]. BMJ 2001; 323: 179-180.
  • 3. Dyer C. Shipman inquiry to investigate 466 deaths. BMJ 2001; 322: 1201.
  • 4. Duckett SJ, Coory M, Sketcher-Baker K. Identifying variations in quality of care in Queensland hospitals. Med J Aust 2007; 187: 571-575. <MJA full text>
  • 5. Mohammed MA, Cheng K, Rouse A, Marshall T. Bristol, Shipman, and clinical governance: Shewhart’s forgotten lessons. Lancet 2001; 357: 463-467.
  • 6. Lilford R, Mohammed MA, Spiegelhalter D, et al. Use and misuse of process and outcome data in managing performance of acute medical care: avoiding institutional stigma. Lancet 2004; 363: 1147-1154.
  • 7. Mohammed MA, Rathbone A, Myers P, et al. An investigation into high mortality general practitioners flagged up via the Shipman Inquiry. BMJ 2004; 328: 1474–1477.
  • 8. Pitches D, Mohammed MA, Lilford R. What is the empirical evidence that hospitals with higher-risk adjusted mortality rates provide poorer quality care? A systematic review of the literature. BMC Health Serv Res [Internet] 2007; 7: 91. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/7/91 (accessed Oct 2007).
  • 9. Aylin P, Best N, Bottle A, Marshall C. Following Shipman: a pilot system for monitoring mortality rates in primary care. Lancet 2003; 362: 485-491.
  • 10. Deming WE. The new economics. 2nd ed. Cambridge, Mass: MIT, 1994.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.