Performance monitoring in Australia and England: from scandals to action

Mohammed A Mohammed and Andrew J Stevens
Med J Aust 2007; 187 (10): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb01413.x
Published online: 19 November 2007

The Queensland approach may deliver empirical evidence on whether performance monitoring leads to improved quality of care

Several high profile medical disasters have occurred recently in Australia and England and have raised concern about quality of care and patient safety. In Australia, the major disasters have included those at the Bundaberg Hospital in Queensland,1 and the Campbelltown and Camden Hospitals in New South Wales; and in England, the Bristol Royal Infirmary scandal2 and the Shipman Affair.3 Although the specifics in each instance are unique, a common outcome from the subsequent inquiries has been a recommendation for some form of centralised performance monitoring using routinely collected data. Why? Because retrospective desktop analysis of routinely collected data signalled the medical disaster before the “whistle blew”.

  • Mohammed A Mohammed1
  • Andrew J Stevens2

  • Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.



remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.