Connect
MJA
MJA

In Other Journals

Tanya Grassi
Med J Aust 2007; 186 (6): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb00912.x
Published online: 19 March 2007

Surgical drainage of the pancreatic duct is generally more effective than endoscopic treatment in patients who have chronic pancreatitis and a dilated pancreatic duct, according to a Dutch study. Pain is the pre-dominant symptom in chronic pancreatitis, with pancreatic duct obstruction being the most important aetiological factor. Decompression of the duct can be achieved surgically by pancreaticojejunostomy or endoscopically with sphincterotomy and dilatation. Researchers conducted a randomised controlled trial to compare the efficacy of surgical and endoscopic drainage. Of the 39 patients in the trial, 19 underwent endoscopic treatment and 20 had operative pancreaticojejunostomy. Outcomes included pain relief, physical and mental health, morbidity, mortality, and pancreatic function. Patients in the surgical arm experienced more rapid and effective pain relief and a better state of physical health. The surgical patients also underwent fewer subsequent procedures. Despite these findings, the researchers comment that endoscopic treatment is still a viable alternative, particularly in people with less extensive disease.




Correspondence: 

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.