Volume 186 - Issue 3
The psychosocial impact of prostate cancer on patients and their partners
Author: Jeremy W Couper
Med J Aust 2007; 186 (3): 159-160. || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb00850.x
Published online: 5 February 2007
Published online: 5 February 2007
In reply: We thank Smith et al for their acknowledgement of the importance of the relational dimension to understanding how prostate cancer (PCA) is understood and approached by men and their partners. The psychosocial implications of prostate cancer for same-sex couples are important and need specific investigation.
However, there are methodological difficulties in attempting to quantify the impact of PCA on same-sex couples and in comparing their experience with other couples. In our review of the literature,1 we discovered that where previous researchers had included same-sex partners in their studies, insufficient numbers were recruited for meaningful quantitative statistical comparisons. For example, Perez and colleagues,2 Neese and colleagues3 and Davison and colleagues4 each recruited only one same-sex couple into their studies of 134, 164 and 74 couples, respectively.
We believe that a qualitative approach is needed, specifically seeking out and examining the experiences of a group of same-sex couples and comparing and contrasting their experiences with those of a group of male–female couples. This is an approach we are considering in future studies to help us develop and refine an effective but broadly applicable couple-focused psychosocial intervention for PCA.
References
- Couper J, Bloch S, Love A, et al. Psychosocial adjustment of female partners of men with prostate cancer: a review of the literature. Psychooncology 2006; 15: 937-953.<eMJA full text>
- Perez M, Skinner E, Meyerowitz B. Sexuality and intimacy following radical prostatectomy: patient and partner perspectives. Health Psychol 2002; 21: 288-293. 0_i1091783
- Neese L, Schover L, Klein E, et al. Finding help for sexual problems after prostate cancer treatment: a phone survey of men’s and women’s perspectives. Psychooncology 2003; 12: 463-473. 0_pgfId-1162944
- Davison B, Gleave M, Goldenberg S, et al. Assessing information and decision preferences of men with prostate cancer and their partners. Cancer Nurs 2002; 25: 42-49. 0_i1091788
Maximising Cancer Prevention and Early Detection in the Australian Cancer Plan: Where Are We Now and What Should Come Next?
Erin L. Symonds, Billie Bonevski, Richard Edwards, Nathan J. Harrison, Sana Ishaque, Nicole M. Rankin, Sibel Saya, Renee J. Smith, Carolyn Ee
An Australian Narrative Review of Adoptive Cellular Therapies in Malignancy: Expanding Indications, Referral Pathways and Safety Beyond Specialist Centres
Sarah Childs, David Ma, Anthony Rodrigues, Jennifer Massey, Rasha Cosman, Venessa Chin, Laila Girgis, James Lynam, Peter Lau, Barbara Withers, Anthony M. Joshua, Ben Tran, Jayesh Desai, Simon J. Harrison, John Moore, Jia Liu
Peritoneal Tuberculosis and Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia: A Case of Hickam's Dictum
Zayn Al-Timimi, Gem Chew, Martin Browne, Christiaan Mostert
From Ambition to Action: Closing Policy, Equity and Implementation Gaps in the Australian Cancer Plan's ‘Enhanced Consumer Experience’
Carla Thamm, Elise Button, Oluwaseyifunmi A. Agbejule, Reegan Knowles, Karen van Gorp, Mark B. Pinkham, Meinir Krishnasamy, Alexandra L. McCarthy, Raymond J. Chan
Sovereignty and Survival: Understanding Lung Cancer Outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People in Australia, a Case–Control Study
Alice R. T. Bergin, Luc te Marvelde, Roger L. Milne, Benjamin J. Solomon, Kris Ivanova, Peter Savas, Stephen J. Luen, Jay Hamann, Andrea Casey, Nicole Watt, Sue M. Evans, Gail Garvey, Sherene Loi
The Changing Indications for Adult Liver Transplantation in Australia: A Narrative Review
Fadak Mohammadi, Alan J. Wigg, Ken Liu, Simone I. Strasser