Does the presence of heart failure alter prescribing of drug therapy after myocardial infarction?
Author: Henry Krum
Published online: 15 January 2007
In reply: We thank Bailey and Naganathan for their thoughtful viewpoint regarding prescribing according to clinical trial criteria. We agree that prescribing in the real world often involves complex decision making, taking into account age, comorbidities, concomitant medications and other factors, whereby guidance regarding individual patients cannot readily be extracted from clinical trial literature. This may certainly contribute to underutilisation of evidence-based drug treatment.1 Nevertheless, several analyses support the contention that physicians who more closely adhere to evidence-based guidelines (which in turn are derived from randomised clinical trials) produce better outcomes for their patients.2,3 Therefore, we would still advocate prescribing as closely as possible to guideline recommendations, while acknowledging that these recommendations may not always be readily applicable to every patient.
References
- Lenzen MJ, Boersma E, Reimer WJ, et al. Under-utilization of evidence-based drug treatment in patients with heart failure is only partially explained by dissimilarity to patients enrolled in landmark trials: a report from the Euro Heart Survey on Heart Failure. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 2706-2713.
- Komajda M, Lapuerta P, Hermans N, et al. Adherence to guidelines is a predictor of outcome in chronic heart failure: the MAHLER survey. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 1653-1659. 0_i1091778
- Majumdar SR, McAlister FA, Cree M, et al. Do evidence-based treatments provide incremental benefits to patients with congestive heart failure already receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors? A secondary analysis of one-year outcomes from the Assessment of Treatment with Lisinopril and Survival (ATLAS) study. Clin Ther 2004; 26: 694-703. 0_i1091782