Religion provides things that are good for health and wellbeing, including social support, existential meaning, a sense of purpose, a coherent belief system and a clear moral code. But these benefits can also come from other sources.
Conversely, religion is shaped by its social context in ways that affect its social role. Religion is no panacea when it comes to improving health.
Religion’s role in health needs to be examined in a broad context, especially the ways in which culture influences religion’s expression of the spiritual.
- 1. Eckersley R. Culture, health and well-being. In: Eckersley R, Dixon J, Douglas B, editors. The social origins of health and well-being. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001: 51-70.
- 2. Eckersley R. Is modern Western culture a health hazard? Int J Epidemiol 2006; 35: 252-258.
- 3. Eckersley R. Culture. In: Galea S, editor. Macrosocial determinants of population health. New York: Springer. In press.
- 4. Eckersley R. Author’s response: culture can be studied at both large and small scales. Int J Epidemiol 2006; 35: 263-265.
- 5. Diener E, Suh E, Lucas R, Smith H. Subjective well-being: three decades of progress. Psychol Bull 1999; 125: 276-302.
- 6. Bond M. The pursuit of happiness. New Sci 2003; 179: 40-47.
- 7. Diener E, Seligman MEP. Beyond money: toward an economy of wellbeing. Psychol Sci Public Interest 2004; 5: 1-31.
- 8. George LK, Ellison CG, Larson DB. Explaining the relationship between religious involvement and health. Psychol Inq 2002; 13: 190-200.
- 9. Eckersley R. Well and good: morality, meaning and happiness. 2nd ed. Melbourne: Text Publishing, 2005.
- 10. Berkman LF, Glass T. Social integration, social network, social support, and health. In: Berkman LF, Kawachi I, editors. Social epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000: 137-173.
- 11. Bagiella E, Hong V, Sloan RP. Religious attendance as a predictor of survival in the EPESE cohorts. Int J Epidemiol 2005; 34: 443-451.
- 12. Hummer RA. Commentary: understanding religious involvement and mortality risk in the United States: comment on Bagiella, Hong, and Sloan. Int J Epidemiol 2005; 34: 452-453.
- 13. Tacey D. The spirituality revolution. Sydney: HarperCollins, 2003.
- 14. Eckersley R, Wierenga A, Wyn J. Flashpoints and signposts: pathways to success and wellbeing for Australia’s young people. Canberra and Melbourne: Australia 21 Ltd, Australian Youth Research Centre and VicHealth, 2006. http://www.australia21.org.au/pdf/HPreport.pdf (accessed Mar 2007).
- 15. Mestrovic S, Glassner BA. A Durkheimian hypothesis on stress. Soc Sci Med 1983; 17: 1315-1327.
- 16. Mestrovic S. A sociological conceptualisation of trauma. Soc Sci Med 1985; 21: 835-848.
- 17. Durkheim E. Suicide: a study in sociology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1970: 361-392.
- 18. Pargament KI. The bitter and the sweet: an evaluation of the costs and benefits of religiousness. Psychol Inq 2002; 13: 168-181.
- 19. Exline JJ. Stumbling blocks on the religious road: fractured relationships, nagging vices, and the inner struggle to believe. Psychol Inq 2002; 13: 182-189.
- 20. Pew Research Center. Among wealthy nations . . . US stands alone in its embrace of religion. The Pew Global Attitudes Project, 2002. http://people-press.org/reports/pdf/167.pdf (accessed Mar 2007).
- 21. Boarini R, Johansson A, D’Ercole MM. Alternative measures of wellbeing. Economics Department Working Papers No. 476. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2006.
- 22. Eckersley R, Dear K. Cultural correlates of youth suicide. Soc Sci Med 2002; 55: 1891-1904.
Publication of your online response is subject to the Medical Journal of Australia's editorial discretion. You will be notified by email within five working days should your response be accepted.