Cervical cancer prevention: the saga goes on, but so much has changed!

Gerard V Wain
Med J Aust 2006; 185 (9): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00658.x
Published online: 6 November 2006

Major changes to the screening environment dictate a review of this successful program

Internationally, cervical cancer prevention programs based on cytological surveillance have been among the most successful public health achievements in modern history. Almost all developed health jurisdictions have tackled the world’s second commonest cancer among women, and implemented successful screening programs. The achievements within each country have been variable, and Australia now has the lowest mortality and second lowest incidence in the developed world1,2 (see Box).

  • 1. Australian Health Ministers’ Advisory Council Cervical Screening Evaluation Committee. Cervical cancer screening in Australia: options for change. Canberra: AGPS, 1991. (Australian Institute of Health Prevention Program Evaluation Series No. 2.)
  • 2. Ferley J, Bray F, Pisani P, Parkin DM. GLOBOCAN 2002: cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide. International Agency for Research on Cancer. CancerBase No. 5, version 2.0. Lyon: IARCPress, 2004. (accessed Sep 2006).
  • 3. Canfell K, Sitas F, Beral V. Cervical cancer in Australia and the United Kingdom: comparison of screening policy, uptake, cancer incidence and mortality. Med J Aust 2006; 185: 482-486. <eMJA full text>
  • 4. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Cervical screening in Australia 2002-2003. Canberra: AIHW, 2005. (AIHW Cat. No. 26; Cancer Series No. 31.)
  • 5. Mitchell HS. How much cervical cancer is being prevented [letter]? Med J Aust 2003; 178: 298. <MJA full text>
  • 6. National Cervical Screening Program. Screening to prevent cervical cancer: guidelines for the management of asymptomatic women with screen detected abnormalities. Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council, 2005.
  • 7. Nogrady B, McLean B. Pap guidelines are dangerous. Aust Doctor 2004; 6 Aug: 1.
  • 8. Wain GV, Kulasingam S, Connelly L, et al. Potential health and economic impact of an HPV in Australia. Program and abstracts of the Public Health Association of Australia 10th National Immunisation Conference. Sydney; 31 Jul 2006. Canberra: PHAA, 2006.
  • 9. Binns PL, Condon JR. Participation in cervical screening by Indigenous women in the Northern Territory: a longitudinal study. Med J Aust 2006; 185: 490-494. <eMJA full text>
  • 10. Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia. Submission to Australian Senate Inquiry on Gynaecological Cancer in Australia. August 2006. (accessed Sep 2006).


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.