Evidence into practice: the mental health hurdle is high
Authors: Andrew J Wilson and David Barton
Published online: 4 September 2006
To the Editor: Hickie and Blashki are to be commended for their view that clinical practice guidelines in mental health should be relevant to a primary care setting.1 Unfortunately, such guidelines have little effect on clinical outcomes, as most general practitioners have not been taught how to use them to their best advantage.2 There is also little known about the best way to implement guidelines in mental health, let alone in primary care mental health settings.3 As a result, more guidelines, even those more attuned to the primary care environment, will be of little benefit to our community.
The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) is actively promoting the use of clinical practice guidelines4 as a quality improvement tool that will allow mental health practitioners (including GPs) to assess their practice more carefully and measure and analyse variance. The next step is to fund research into how best to implement mental health guidelines at the coalface.
It is only through practice-based research that the barriers to successful implementation of evidence-based practice can be identified and overcome. Such research could be funded via a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) or Australian Research Council (ARC) grant program and coordinated by groups such as the RANZCP or the National Mental Health Working Group Safety and Quality Partnership Group. Mental health has already been identified as a grant funding priority by the ARC.5 Once this has been achieved, then training and mentoring to help practitioners review their practice as part of a quality improvement framework is required, rather than more guidelines per se.
Providing well researched, up-to-date and accessible information for GPs on “self-help, self-monitoring, [and] detailed illness descriptions”, as suggested by Hickie and Blashki, is commendable, but is not what is required for guidelines to truly improve the safety and quality of mental health care in Australia.
References
- Hickie IB, Blashki GA. Evidence into practice: the mental health hurdle is high. Med J Aust 2006; 184: 542-543. <eMJA full text>
- Woolf S. Practice guidelines, a new reality in medicine. II. Methods of developing guidelines. Arch Intern Med 1992; 152: 946-952. 0_i1091786
- Rush J. Clinical practice guidelines: good news, bad news, or no news? Arch Gen Psychiatry 1993; 50: 483-490. 0_pgfId-1121386
- Barton D, Codyre D, Lovelock H, et al. Implementation of the RANZCP Clinical Practice Guidelines. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2005; 39: A123-A124. 0_i1091791
- Australian Research Council. Priority areas for ARC funding. http://www.arc.gov.au/grant_programs/priority_areas.htm (accessed Aug 2006).