Connect
MJA
MJA

Public reporting of hospital outcomes based on administrative data

Kerry Innes, Kirsten McKenzie and Sue Walker
Med J Aust 2006; 185 (10): 574.
Published online: 20 November 2006

To the Editor: We recently read with concern the article by Scott and Ward on public reporting of hospital outcomes.1 While we do not want to enter into the debate about whether the public release of hospital performance reports is beneficial or harmful, we would like to address some issues relating to the accuracy of administrative data. The authors stated that “data are often [our italics] inaccurate, incomplete, or provide insufficient clinical detail” and that the “accuracy of diagnosis coding is vari-able”. They also mention the potential for “gaming” or “up-coding” by hospitals to make their institutions look better in public reports.

  • Kerry Innes1
  • Kirsten McKenzie2
  • Sue Walker2

  • 1 National Centre for Classification in Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.
  • 2 National Centre for Classification in Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD.

Correspondence: k.mckenzie@qut.edu.au

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Responses are now closed for this article.