Connect
MJA
MJA

A randomised controlled trial of hot water (45°C) immersion versus ice packs for pain relief in bluebottle stings

Conrad Loten, Barrie Stokes, David Worsley, Jamie E Seymour, Simon Jiang and Geoffrey K Isbister
Med J Aust 2006; 184 (7): 329-333.

Summary

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of hot water immersion for the treatment of Physalia sp. (bluebottle or Portuguese Man-of-War) stings.

Design: Open-label, randomised comparison trial. Primary analysis was by intention to treat, with secondary analysis of nematocyst-confirmed stings. One halfway interim analysis was planned.

Setting: Surf lifesaving first aid facilities at two beaches in eastern Australia from 30 December 2003 to 5 March 2005.

Participants: 96 subjects presenting after swimming in the ocean for treatment of an apparent sting by a bluebottle.

Interventions: Hot water immersion (45°C) of the affected part versus ice pack application.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was a clinically important reduction in pain as measured by the visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes were the development of regional or radiating pain, frequency of systemic symptoms, and proportion with pruritus or rash on follow-up.

Results: 49 patients received hot water immersion and 47 received ice packs. The two groups had similar baseline features, except patients treated with hot water had more severe initial pain (VAS [mean ± SD]: 54 ± 22 mm versus 42 ± 22 mm). After 10 minutes, 53% of the hot water group reported less pain versus 32% treated with ice (21%; 95% CI, 1%–39%; P = 0.039). After 20 minutes, 87% of the hot water group reported less pain versus 33% treated with ice (54%; 95% CI, 35%–69%; P = 0.002). The trial was stopped after the halfway interim analysis because hot water immersion was shown to be effective (P = 0.002). Hot water was more effective at 20 minutes in nematocyst-confirmed stings (95% versus 29%; P = 0.002). Radiating pain occurred less with hot water (10% versus 30%; P = 0.039). Systemic effects were uncommon in both groups.

Conclusions: Immersion in water at 45°C for 20 minutes is an effective and practical treatment for pain from bluebottle stings.

  • Conrad Loten1
  • Barrie Stokes2
  • David Worsley1
  • Jamie E Seymour3
  • Simon Jiang2
  • Geoffrey K Isbister4,5

  • 1 Hunter New England Area Health Service, Newcastle, NSW.
  • 2 University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW.
  • 3 Department of Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD.
  • 4 Tropical Toxinology Unit, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT.
  • 5 Department of Clinical Toxicology, Newcastle Mater Hospital, Newcastle, NSW.

Correspondence: gsbite@ferntree.com

Acknowledgements: 

We thank all the members of the surf lifesaving clubs and surf lifesavers employed by Newcastle City Council for their assistance in identifying patients for the study. We particularly thank Nobby’s and Dixon Park Surf Lifesaving Clubs for allowing us to use space in their clubs and install the thermostatic mixing valves. We thank Enware Australia for providing cost-price valves and Macs Plumbing for their installation. We thank John Bolton for assistance in obtaining council permission to undertake the study and Kate Armstrong and Paul Healey for recruiting patients. We thank Tony Smith for his comments on the manuscript. The study was partially funded by a Margaret Mitchell Grant (Newcastle Mater Hospital Internal Grant) and a donation from the NSW Surf Life Saving Council. Geoffrey Isbister is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Career Development Award ID300785.

Competing interests:

None identified.

  • 1. Williamson JA, Fenner PJ, Burnett JW, Rifkin JF. Venomous and poisonous marine animals. 1st ed. Sydney: UNSW Press, 1996.
  • 2. Isbister GK. Marine envenomation and poisoning. In: Dart RC, editor. Medical toxicology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2004: 1621-1644.
  • 3. Fenner P. International Life Saving Federation policy statement 6: marine envenomation. Belgium: International Life Saving Federation, 2000: 1-5.
  • 4. Exton DR, Fenner PJ, Williamson JA. Cold packs: effective topical analgesia in the treatment of painful stings by Physalia and other jellyfish. Med J Aust 1989; 151: 625-626.
  • 5. Church JE, Hodgson WC. The pharmacological activity of fish venoms. Toxicon 2002; 40: 1083-1093.
  • 6. Bucherl W, Buckley EE. Venomous animals and their venoms. Vol 3. London: Academic Press, 1971.
  • 7. Endean R. Separation of two myotoxins from nematocysts of the box jellyfish (Chironex fleckeri). Toxicon 1987; 25: 483-492.
  • 8. Carrette TJ, Cullen P, Little M, et al. Temperature effects on box jellyfish venom: a possible treatment for envenomed patients? Med J Aust 2002; 177: 654-655. <MJA full text>
  • 9. Nomura JT, Sato RL, Ahern RM, et al. A randomized paired comparison trial of cutaneous treatments for acute jellyfish (Carybdea alata) stings. Am J Emerg Med 2002; 20: 624-626.
  • 10. Bowra J, Gillett M, Morgan J, Swinburn E. Randomised crossover trial comparing hot showers and icepacks in the treatment of Physalia envenomation [abstract]. Emerg Med 2002; 14: A22.
  • 11. Lopez EA, Weisman RS, Bernstein J. A prospective study of the acute therapy of jellyfish envenomations [abstract]. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2000; 38: 512.
  • 12. Thomas CS, Scott SA, Galanis DJ, Goto RS. Box jellyfish (Carybdea alata) in Waikiki: their influx cycle plus the analgesic effect of hot and cold packs on their stings to swimmers at the beach: a randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial. Hawaii Med J 2001; 60: 100-107.
  • 13. Moritz AR, Henriques FC. Studies in thermal injury II: the relative importance of time and surface temperature in the causation of cutaneous burns. Am J Pathol 1947; 23: 695-720.
  • 14. O’Reilly GM, Isbister GK, Lawrie PM, et al. Prospective study of jellyfish stings from tropical Australia, including the major box jellyfish Chironex fleckeri. Med J Aust 2001; 175: 652-655. <MJA full text>
  • 15. Powell CV, Kelly AM, Williams A. Determining the minimum clinically significant difference in visual analog pain score for children. Ann Emerg Med 2001; 37: 28-31.
  • 16. Currie BJ, Wood YK. Identification of Chironex fleckeri envenomation by nematocyst recovery from skin. Med J Aust 1995; 162: 478-480.
  • 17. Bird SB, Dickson EW. Clinically significant changes in pain along the visual analog scale. Ann Emerg Med 2001; 38: 639-643.
  • 18. Beecher HK. The powerful placebo. JAMA 1955; 159: 1602-1606.
  • 19. Wampold BE, Minami T, Tierney SC, et al. The placebo is powerful: estimating placebo effects in medicine and psychotherapy from randomized clinical trials. J Clin Psychol 2005; 61: 835-854.
  • 20. Ellis RM, Sprivulis PC, Jelinek GA, et al. A double-blind, randomized trial of intravenous versus intramuscular antivenom for red-back spider envenoming. Emerg Med Australas 2005; 17: 152-156.
  • 21. Holdgate A, Asha S, Craig J, Thompson J. Comparison of a verbal numeric rating scale with the visual analogue scale for the measurement of acute pain. Emerg Med (Fremantle) 2003; 15: 441-446.
  • 22. Todd KH, Funk KG, Funk JP, Bonacci R. Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity. Ann Emerg Med 1996; 27: 485-489.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Responses are now closed for this article.