Establishment of an Australian motor neurone disease registry
Authors: Matthew C Kiernan, Paul Talman, Robert D Henderson, Rodney Harris and on behalf of the Australian Motor Neurone Disease Registry Steering Committee
Published online: 3 April 2006
To the Editor: Motor neurone disease (MND) is a relentlessly progressive neurodegenerative disease with a median survival of 1–3 years. It results in the death of nearly 400 Australians per year.1 The management of MND remains problematic, tending to be offered in a heterogeneous and ad-hoc fashion across Australia. This heterogeneity arises in part from a lack of understanding of the aetiology of the disease and its progression in different patients,2 the absence of established guidelines for standard care,3 and a lack of concentrated experience among medical practitioners, nursing and allied health care workers in treating patients with MND.
With new diagnostic techniques, treatments and interventions for MND undergoing trials, there is a clear need for more baseline information on MND management and outcomes and a method for monitoring any changes on a population basis.4 To facilitate this, the Australian Motor Neurone Disease Registry (AMNDR) has been developed. The Registry is governed by a steering committee comprising specialist physicians from each state and territory around Australia, neuroscientists, an epidemiologist and patient representatives.
AMNDR was launched in Sydney in June 2004 to coincide with Motor Neurone Disease Global Awareness Day and, to November 2005, had enrolled 351 patients from 67 study locations, with 88% of registrations coming from 10 major sites. As of September 2005, 90 patients had undergone at least one further follow-up assessment. A copy of the registration, assessment and completion case report forms can be viewed on the AMNDR website (http://ww.amndr.org.au).
From the patient information collected in the registration data, three distinct clinical phenotypes have emerged (Box). Patients with the “global” MND phenotype (combined upper and lower motor neurone signs in at least two regions) tended to have the shortest survival time.
AMNDR was designed to obtain information that will increase the understanding of MND and its progression in different patients. Through the process of registry establishment, those involved in care, management and scientific research related to MND have been galvanised into a more effective and cooperative working unit. Ownership of the database has been retained by all who have contributed to data collection, and the information has been increasingly used to promote research into the causes and treatment of MND, locally and internationally.5 Through participation, it is expected that treating doctors will be able to evaluate their current management and associated patient outcomes relative to other centres around Australia.
Demographic data for 351 patients with motor neurone disease enrolled in the Australian Motor Neurone Disease Registry to November 2005, by phenotype
Acknowledgements
References
- Kiernan MC. Riluzole: a glimmer of hope in the treatment of motor neurone disease. Med J Aust 2005; 182: 319-320. 0_CHDBDFII
- Bradley WG, Anderson F, Bromberg M, et al. Current management of ALS: comparison of the ALS CARE database and the AAN practice parameter. The American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2001; 57: 500-504. 0_CHDIDDHB
- Winhammar JM, Rowe DB, Henderson RD, Kiernan MC. Assessment of disease progression in motor neuron disease. Lancet Neurol 2005; 4: 229-238. 0_CHDBDIFH
- Talman P, Mathers S, Mostert E, Forbes A. Evaluation of clinical patterns and rate of progression of motor neuron disease. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord 2002; 3: 93. 0_CHDEEJED
- Talman P, Rowe D, Kiernan MC. Australian Motor Neurone Disease Registry (AMNDR). J Neurol Sci 2005; 238 Suppl 1: S214. 0_i1092084
Motor Neuron Disease Mortality Trends in Australia From 1986 to 2023: A Population-Based Study
Carol M. Y. Lee, Rupendra N. Shrestha, Julian Gold, Mark Stevenson, Kelly L. Williams, Lyndal Henden, Sandrine K. K. Chan Moi Fat, Zoe Zussa, Amanda Wright, Martin Jude, Mark A. S. Laidlaw, Willem J. R. Fokkink, Dominic B. Rowe
Mild traumatic brain injury and concussion and persisting post‐concussion symptoms: new guidelines to support evidence‐based assessment and management in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand
Karen M Barlow, Jennie L Ponsford, Alice Theodom, Gill Cowen, Gavin A Davis, Vicki Anderson, Franz E Babl, David Cole, Jennifer Cullen, Stuart R Dalziel, Melinda Fitzgerald, Howard Flavell, Caroline Yates, Rebecca Kimble, John H Olver, Rhonda Orr, Mark Ralfe, Michael Rose, Nick Rushworth, Julia Treleaven, Gary Browne, Nathan Delang, Sarah Harris, Gary Mitchell, Sean Tweedy
The prevalence of and variation in indicators of the quality and safety of long term aged care in Australia, 2019: a cross‐sectional population‐based study
Tesfahun C Eshetie, Gillian E Caughey, Catherine Lang, Olivia Ryan, Renuka Visvanathan, Craig Whitehead, Keith Evans, Janet K Sluggett, Jyoti Khadka, Carolyn Dawkins, Helena Williams, Miranda Starke, Sara Blunt, Anne Liddell, Megan Corlis, Anna Sheppeard, Penelope Lello, Marilyn Thien, Steven L Wesselingh, Maria C Inacio
Health and economic benefits of improving pre‐hospital identification of stroke in Australian women: a modelling study
Thomas Gadsden, Lei Si, Emily R Atkins, Cheryl Carcel, Xia Wang, Stephen Jan, Mark Woodward, Laura E Downey
Symptom burden, quality of life, and diagnostic journey of people with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, Australia, 2021–24: a descriptive patient registry data study
Marie‐Claire Seeley, Gemma Wilson, Eric Ong, Amy Langdon, Jonathan Chieng, Danielle Bailey, Kristina Comacchio, Amanda Page, Dennis H Lau, Celine Gallagher
The intersection of rurality and dementia prevalence in Australia for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non‐Indigenous peoples
Antonia J Clarke, Marwan Ahmed, Judith M Katzenellenbogen, John Towney (Wiradjuri), Anna H Balabanski, Adrienne Withall (Dharawal Yuin), Kylie Radford, Amy Brodtmann