MJA
MJA

Effective shade structures

Med J Aust 2006; 184 (1): 13-15.

Summary

  • Research shows that a large proportion of shade structures provide insufficient protection against the sun’s ultraviolet light.

  • Shade creation guidelines need to be updated.

  • Community organisations such as child care centres and schools that need to provide effective shade are hindered by cost and building regulations.

  • The protective function of shade structures is more important than their aesthetic appeal.

Please login with your free MJA account to view this article in full

  • David J Turnbull1
  • Alfio V Parisi2

  • Faculty of Sciences, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD.

Correspondence: 

Competing interests:

None identified.

  • 1. Commonwealth Department of Health and Family Services, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. National Health Priority Areas report on cancer control 1997. AIHW Cat. No. PHE 4. Canberra: the Department, AIHW, 1998.
  • 2. Parsons P, Neale R, Wolski P, et al. The shady side of solar protection. Med J Aust 1998; 168: 327-330.
  • 3. Turnbull DJ, Parisi AV. Spectral UV in public shade settings. J Photochem Photobiol B 2003; 69: 13-19.
  • 4. Turnbull DJ, Parisi AV, Sabburg J. Scattered UV beneath public shade structures during winter. Photochem Photobiol 2003; 78: 180-183.
  • 5. Turnbull DJ, Parisi AV. Annual variation of the angular distribution of UV beneath public shade structures. J Photochem Photobiol B 2004; 76: 41-47.
  • 6. Turnbull DJ, Parisi AV. Increasing the ultraviolet protection provided by public shade structures. J Photochem Photobiol B 2005; 78: 61-67.
  • 7. Cancer Council Australia. National Cancer Prevention Policy 2004-06. NSW: the Council, 2004.
  • 8. Greenwood JS, Soulos GP, Thomas ND. Under Cover: guidelines for shade planning and design. Sydney: NSW Cancer Council, NSW Health Department, 1998.
  • 9. Ambach W, Blumthaler M. Biological effectiveness of solar UV radiation in humans. Experientia 1993; 49: 747-753.
  • 10. Hill D, White V, Marks R, et al. Melanoma prevention: behavioural and nonbehavioural factors in sunburn among an Australian urban population. Prev Med 1992; 21: 654-669.
  • 11. Stanton WR, Chakma B, O’Riordan DL, Eyeson-Annan M. Sun exposure and primary prevention of skin cancer for infants and young children during autumn/winter. Aust N Z J Public Health 2000; 24: 178-184.
  • 12. MacLennan R, Green AC, McLeod GR, Martin NG. Increasing incidence of cutaneous melanoma in Queensland, Australia. J Natl Cancer Inst 1992; 84: 1427-1432.
  • 13. Grant RH, Heisler GM. Solar ultraviolet-B and photosynthetically-active irradiance in the urban sub-canopy: a survey of influences. Int J Biometeorol 1996; 39: 201-212.
  • 14. Grant RH, Heisler GM, Gao W. Estimation of pedestrian level UV exposure under trees. Photochem Photobiol 2002; 75: 369-376.
  • 15. Moise AF, Aynsley R. Ambient ultraviolet radiation levels in public shade settings. Int J Biometeorol 1999; 43: 128-138.
  • 16. Wong CF. Scattered ultraviolet radiation underneath a shade-cloth. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 1994; 10: 221-224.
  • 17. Parisi AV, Willey A, Kimlin MG, et al. Penetration of solar erythemal UV radiation in the shade of two common Australian trees. Health Phys 1999; 76: 682-686.
  • 18. Parisi AV, Kimlin MG, Wong JCF, et al. Reduction in the personal annual solar erythemal ultraviolet exposure provided by Australian gum trees. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2000; 92: 307-312.
  • 19. Parisi AV, Kimlin MG, Wong JCF, et al. Diffuse component of the solar ultraviolet radiation in tree shade. J Photochem Photobiol B 2000; 54: 116-120.
  • 20. Parisi AV, Green A, Kimlin MG. Diffuse solar ultraviolet radiation and implications for preventing human eye damage. Photochem Photobiol 2001; 73: 135-139.
  • 21. Parisi AV, Kimlin MG, Turnbull D. Spectral shade ratios on horizontal and sun normal surfaces for single trees and relatively cloud free sky. J Photochem Photobiol B 2001; 65: 151-156.
  • 22. Parisi AV, Wong JCF, Kimlin MG, et al. Comparison between seasons of the ultraviolet environment in the shade of Australian trees. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 2001; 17: 55-59.
  • 23. Parisi AV, Kimlin MG, Lester R, et al. Lower body anatomical distribution of solar ultraviolet radiation on the human form in standing and sitting postures. J Photochem Photobiol B 2003; 69: 1-6.
  • 24. Gies P, MacKay C. Measurements of the solar UVR protection provided by shade structures in New Zealand primary schools. Photochem Photobiol 2004; 80: 334-339.
  • 25. University of Queensland Department of Architecture. Shade for sports fields. Brisbane: Queensland Health, 1995.
  • 26. University of Queensland Department of Architecture. Shade for public pools. Brisbane: Queensland Health, 1996.
  • 27. University of Queensland Department of Architecture. Shade for young children. Brisbane: Queensland Health, 1997.
  • 28. University of Queensland Department of Architecture. Report on the shade evaluation project. Brisbane: Queensland Health, 1999.
  • 29. NSW Health Department, Cancer Council NSW. Sun protection: a guide to develop better practice in skin cancer prevention in NSW. Sydney: the Department, the Council, 2001.
  • 30. Queensland Cancer Fund. Available at: http://www.qldcancer.com.au/Cancer_Info_and_Services/PED/CreatingShadeStructures.html (accessed Dec 2004).
  • 31. Standard Building Regulation 1993. Available at: http://www.legislation.qld.gov.au (accessed Mar 2005).

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article