To the Editor: The recent article by Koczwara and colleagues proposing a national exit examination for medical students1 prompted me to recall a 1970 trial of a national examination in surgery.2 Seven of the then eight medical schools participated. Interstate differences were wide for some questions; separate analyses of the 15 teaching hospitals showed variation to be even wider within a university than between universities. Do local differences still undermine the validity of a national examination?
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 8 Vernon Street, Hunters Hill, NSW 2110.
- 1. Koczwara B, Tattersall MHN, Barton MB, et al. Achieving equal standards in medical student education: is a national exit examination the answer? Med J Aust 2005; 182: 228-230. <MJA full text>
- 2. Cox K, Ludbrook J, McCarthy W, Dunstan M. National comparisons in a trial examination in surgery. Br J Med Educ 1973; 7: 21-24.
- 3. Cox K. No Oscar for OSCE. Med Educ 1990; 24: 540-545.
- 4. Cox K. Clinical practice is not applied scientific method. Aust N Z J Surg 1995; 65: 553-557.
- 5. Cox K. A community of scholars or scholars of the community? A note on the limits of relevance. Med Educ 1984; 18: 314-320.
- 6. Cox K. What is included in clinical competence? Med J Aust 1988; 148: 25-27.
- 7. Cox K. Examining and recording clinical performance: a critique and some recommendations. Education for Health 2000; 13: 45-52.
- 8. Cox K. Looking in the wrong direction. Aust N Z J Surg 1997; 67: 829-833.