Connect
MJA
MJA

Medical humanities: to cure sometimes, to relieve often, to comfort always

Jill Gordon
Med J Aust 2005; 182 (1): 5-8.

Summary

  • The medical humanities are concerned with “the science of the human”, and bring the perspectives of disciplines such as history, philosophy, literature, art and music to understanding health, illness and medicine.

  • The medical humanities are designed to overcome the separation of clinical care from the “human sciences” and to foster interdisciplinary teaching and research to optimise patient care.

  • Medical humanities have become part of the mainstream in medical education in North America and the United Kingdom, and are now integrated into many medical curricula in Australia.

  • The Australasian Association for Medical Humanities was inaugurated in November 2004; a postgraduate program in the medical humanities began at the University of Sydney in 2003.

Please login with your free MJA account to view this article in full

  • Jill Gordon

  • Faculty of Arts, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.


Acknowledgements: 

The Masters degree in Medical Humanities at the University of Sydney owes its inspiration to Associate Professor Joanne Finkelstein, Dean for Postgraduate Coursework in the Faculty of Arts. She recognised the possibilities offered by such a program, and initiated and fostered its development.

Competing interests:

None identified.

  • 1. American Society for Bioethics and Humanities. Purpose of the ASBH. Available at: www.asbh.org/about/purpose.htm (accessed Oct 2004).
  • 2. Evans M, Arnott R, Bolton G, et al. The medical humanities as a field of enquiry. Statement from the Association for Medical Humanities. J Med Ethics 2001; 27: 104-105.
  • 3. Snow C. The two cultures and the scientific revolution: the Rede Lecture 1959. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1961.
  • 4. Evans HM, Macnaughton J. Should medical humanities be a multidisciplinary or an interdisciplinary study? Med Humanit 2004; 30: 1-4.
  • 5. Schneiderman L. Empathy and the literary imagination. Ann Intern Med 2002; 137: 627-629.
  • 6. Willcock S, Daly M, Tennant C, Allard B. Burnout and psychiatric morbidity in new medical graduates. Med J Aust 2004; 181: 357-360. <MJA full text>
  • 7. Illich I. Limits to medicine: medical nemesis, the expropriation of health. New York: Pantheon Books; 1976.
  • 8. Miles S. Abu Ghraib: its legacy for military medicine. Lancet 2004; 364: 725-729.
  • 9. World Health Organization. Scaling up response to infectious diseases: a way out of poverty. WHO Report. Geneva: WHO, 2002.
  • 10. Gottlieb S. Chinese herb may cause cancer. BMJ 2000; 320: 1623A.
  • 11. Ernst E, White A. Life-threatening adverse reactions after acupuncture? A systematic review. Pain 1997; 71: 123-126.
  • 12. Schon D. Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1987.
  • 13. Gordon J. Assessing students’ personal and professional development using portfolios and interviews. Med Educ 2003; 37: 335-340.
  • 14. Campbell C. Study of the factors influencing the stimulus to learning recorded by physicians keeping a learning portfolio. J Contin Educ Health Prof 1999; 19: 16-24.
  • 15. Epstein R. Mindful practice. JAMA 1999; 282: 833-839.
  • 16. Charon R. Narrative medicine: a model for empathy, reflection, profession, and trust. JAMA 2001; 286: 1897-1902.
  • 17. Strawson G. Tales of the unexpected. The Guardian 2004; 10 January: 7, 10.
  • 18. Haney C, Banks W, Zimbardo P. Interpersonal dynamics in a simulated prison. Int J Criminol Penol 1973; 1: 69-97.
  • 19. Milgram S. Behavioral study of obedience. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 1963; 67: 371-378.
  • 20. Hibbert C. The roots of evil: a social history of crime and punishment. Stroud: Sutton Publishing, 2003.
  • 21. Conroy J. Unspeakable acts, ordinary people: the dynamics of torture. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001.
  • 22. Jones J. Bad blood: the Tuskegee syphilis experiment. New York: Free Press, 1993.
  • 23. Gaita R. A common humanity: thinking about love and truth and justice. London: Routledge, 2000.
  • 24. Shadbolt N. Attitudes to healthcare and self-care among junior medical officers: a preliminary report. Med J Aust 2002; 177 (1 Suppl): S19-S20. <MJA full text>
  • 25. Schattner P, Davidson S, Serry N. Doctors’ health and wellbeing: taking up the challenge in Australia. Med J Aust 2004; 181: 348-349. <MJA full text>
  • 26. Dittrich L. The humanities and medicine: reports of 41 US, Canadian and international programs [preface]. Acad Med 2003; 78: 951-952.
  • 27. General Medical Council. Tomorrow’s doctors: recommendations on undergraduate medical education. London: GMC, 1993.
  • 28. Association of American Medical Colleges. Innovation in medical education: the arts as a teacher. Available at: www.aamc.org/newsroom/reporter/august03/innovations.htm (accessed Oct 2004).
  • 29. Powis D. How to do it — select medical students. BMJ 1998; 317: 1149-1150.
  • 30. Gordon J. Fostering students’ personal and professional development in medicine: a new framework for PPD. Med Educ 2003; 37: 341-349.
  • 31. Dean S, Barratt A, Hendry G, Lyon P. Preparedness for hospital practice among graduates of a problem-based, graduate-entry medical program. Med J Aust 2003; 178: 163-166. <MJA full text>
  • 32. Gordon J. Report to the Committee of Deans of Australian Medical Schools: Conference on Medicine and the Humanities; Sydney, NSW; 5-6 Nov 2004.
  • 33. Evans M. Is medicine a “cultural good”? Med J Aust 2005; 182: 3-4.<eMJA full text>
  • 34. Evans M, Greaves D. Medical humanities at the University of Wales Swansea. Med Humanit 2001; 27: 51-52.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Responses are now closed for this article.