Endless reform versus front-line care

Martin B Van Der Weyden
Med J Aust 2004; 181 (4): 177. || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2004.tb06229.x
Published online: 16 August 2004

A recent media release from Victoria’s Minister for Health proclaimed that the Children’s and Women’s hospitals in Melbourne, merged in the healthcare reforms of the 1990s, were to be split once more into separate specialist hospitals. This is yet another turnaround which typifies the vicissitudes of healthcare reform.

We endured the quasi-market models, in which patients became customers and doctors providers; and lived through diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) and models of casemix funding. At the same time, accountability and quality of care became embedded in performance indicators, and market forces were supposed to deliver efficiency, effectiveness and cost control.

With ongoing reform, we have witnessed cycles of centralisation and decentralisation, been subjected to the rhetoric of commercialism, and endured re-engineering of systems and prioritisation of services. Current reform aspirations centre on seamless integration of systems — whether it be health finances or patient care — along with decentralisation and the culling of duplication.

But doctors have become fatigued with the reforms and demoralised by their clinical irrelevance. As Justin Stoelwinder, an expert in health policy, recently noted, “Health system reform seems to have little to do with the actual business of delivering and managing health care. Presumably, reform meets the needs of the centre, politicians and bureaucrats . . . ”. Doctors involved in “front-line patient care” are shell-shocked by repeated reform initiatives while front-line stresses and pressures continue unabated.

With a federal election looming, we will see yet another barrage of reform agendas, accompanied by the inevitable array of new commissions and committees. But one thing is certain — healthcare chaos will continue if politicians fail to enhance front-line care capacity along with community care. Without this commitment, we will have more of the same — reform salvos aimed at clinically irrelevant targets.

  • Martin B Van Der Weyden

  • The Medical Journal of Australia



remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.