International Campaign to Revitalise Academic Medicine (ICRAM): what does it mean for Australia?

David Wilkinson and Robyn L Ward
Med J Aust 2004; 181 (11): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2004.tb06512.x
Published online: 6 December 2004

Has academic medicine lost its leadership role?

Many of us believe academic medicine is in crisis.1-3 Tugwell, Professor of Medicine at the University of Ottawa, has written of the need to “bring people together to debate whether the existing structure of academic medicine is still fundamentally sound and, if not, to propose alternatives to it”.1 Editor in chief of the Journal of the American Medical Association, DeAngelis, recently wrote that “the traditional 3-legged stool of academic medicine comprising education, patient care, and research is broken. The education leg is currently being held together by peanut butter and bubble gum combined with the unselfish persistence of faculty dedicated to teaching”.2 The other core roles are also under threat. Much medical research today is done outside academic medicine, for example in institutes of biotechnology and biomedicine. And most clinical service, even in teaching hospitals, is provided by non-academic doctors.

  • David Wilkinson1
  • Robyn L Ward2

  • 1 School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD.
  • 2 Department of Medical Oncology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW.



remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.