Connect
MJA
MJA

Analysis of complaints lodged by patients attending Victorian hospitals, 1997–2001

David McD Taylor, Rory S Wolfe and Peter A Cameron
Med J Aust 2004; 181 (1): 31-35.

Summary

Objective: To describe complaints by patients and compare rates of complaint in demographic subgroups of patients and hospital departments.

Design and setting: Retrospective analysis of complaints made by patients attending 67 hospitals (metropolitan, 25; rural, 42) in Victoria, and lodged with the Victorian Health Complaint Information Program (January 1997 – December 2001).

Main outcome measures: Demographic characteristics of patients lodging complaints and the hospital department involved; nature and outcome of complaints.

Results: From a total of over 13 million patients presenting to hospital during the study period, 19 156 patients or their representatives (mostly their parents, children or spouses) lodged 26 785 “issues” of complaint (overall complaint rate, 1.42 complaints/1000 patients). Significantly more complaints (P < 0.001) were lodged by (or on behalf of) female patients (complaint rate ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.2–1.3), public patients (rate ratio, 2.1; 95% CI, 2.0–2.2) and Australian-born patients (rate ratio, 8.9; 95% CI, 8.3–9.6). The complaint rate for general wards was 6.2/1000 patients (95% CI, 6.1–6.3). Intensive care units had a similar rate of 5.9/1000 (95% CI, 5.4–6.5), but aged-care departments had a significantly higher rate of 45.2/1000 (95% CI, 39.5–51.7), while emergency departments (1.9/1000; 95% CI, 1.8–2.0), operating theatres (1.0/1000; 95% CI, 1.0–1.1), day-procedure units (0.5/1000; 95% CI, 0.5–0.6) and outpatient departments (0.4/1000; 95% CI, 0.4–0.4) had significantly lower rates. Complaints relating to communication (poor attention, discourtesy, rudeness), access to healthcare (no/inadequate service, treatment delays) and treatment (inadequate treatment and nursing care) accounted for 29.2%, 28.5% and 22.5% of complaints, respectively. Most (84.5%) complaints were resolved. Apologies or explanations resolved 27.8% and 27.5% of complaints, respectively.

Conclusion: Interventions to decrease the number of complaints in the areas of communication and access to healthcare need to be implemented. The active use of complaint data for quality-improvement activities is recommended.

Please login with your free MJA account to view this article in full

  • David McD Taylor1
  • Rory S Wolfe2
  • Peter A Cameron3

  • 1 Emergency Department, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC.
  • 2 Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Prahran, VIC.
  • 3 Emergency Department, The Alfred Hospital, Prahran, VIC.

Correspondence: 

Acknowledgements: 

Our study was supported by a grant from the Department of Human Services (Victoria). The department contributed to the development of the study design and, in conjunction with the Health Services Commission, was responsible for providing all data. We thank especially Ms Sue O’Sullivan (Department of Human Services) and Mr Phillip Punshon (Health Services Commission).

Competing interests:

None identified.

  • 1. Sun BC, Adams J, Orav EJ, et al. Determinants of patient satisfaction and willingness to return with emergency care. Ann Emerg Med 2000; 35: 426-434.
  • 2. Pichert JW, Miller CS, Hollo AH, et al. What health professionals can do to identify and resolve patient dissatisfaction. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 1998; 24: 303-312.
  • 3. Bendall-Lyon D, Powers TL. The role of complaint management in the service recovery process. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 2001; 27: 278-286.
  • 4. Schwartz LR, Overton DT. Emergency department complaints: a one-year analysis. Ann Emerg Med 1987; 16: 857-861.
  • 5. Burstin HR, Conn A, Setnik G, et al. Benchmarking and quality improvement: the Harvard Emergency Department Quality Study. Am J Med 1999; 107: 437-449.
  • 6. Schwartz LR, Overton DT. The management of patient complaints and dissatisfaction. Emerg Med Clin North Am 1992; 10: 557-572.
  • 7. Anderson K, Allan D, Finucane P. A 30-month study of patient complaints at a major Australian teaching hospital. J Qual Clin Practice 2001; 21: 109-111.
  • 8. Javetz R, Stern Z. Patients’ complaints as a management tool for continuous quality improvement. J Manag Med 1996; 10: 39-48.
  • 9. Thompson DA, Yarnold PR, Williams DR, Adams SL. Effect of actual waiting time, perceived waiting time, information delivery, and expressive quality on patient satisfaction in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 1996; 28: 657-665.
  • 10. Pichert J, Federspiel C, Hickson G, et al. Identifying medical center units with disproportionate shares of patient complaints. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 1999; 25: 288-299.
  • 11. StataCorporation [statistical software], release 8.0. College Station, Tex: Stata Corporation, 2003.
  • 12. Daniel AE, Burn RJ, Horarik S. Patients’ complaints about medical practice. Med J Aust 1999; 170: 598-602. <MJA full text>
  • 13. Carrasquillo O, Orav EJ, Brennan TA, Burstin HR. Impact of language barriers on patient satisfaction in an emergency department. J Gen Intern Med 1999; 14: 82-87.
  • 14. Douglas D, Harrison RD. Turning around patient complaints in a regional hospital. Aust Health Rev 1996; 19: 126-137.
  • 15. Taylor DMcD, Wolfe R, Cameron PA. Complaints from emergency department patients largely result from treatment and communication problems. Emerg Med 2002; 14: 43-49.
  • 16. Cameron PA, Campbell DA. Access block: problems and progress [editorial]. Med J Aust 2003; 178: 99-100. <MJA full text>
  • 17. Halsel D. Handling patient complaints. Missouri Med 1993; 90: 645-647.
  • 18. Standards Australia. Australian Standard 4269-1995: Complaints handling. Sydney: Standards Australia, 1995: 1-14.
  • 19. Romios P, Newby L, Wohlers M, et al. Turning wrongs into rights: learning from consumer reported incidents. An annotated literature. Health Care Complaints Commission. July 2003. Available at: www.health.nsw.gov.au/hccc/docs/turning/lit_rev.pdf (accessed Apr 2004).
  • 20. Wilson R, Harrison B, Gibberd R, Hamilton J. An analysis of the causes of adverse events from the Quality in Australian Health Care Study. Med J Aust 1999; 170: 411-415. <MJA full text>

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Responses are now closed for this article.