In reply: Clinicians' attitudes to clinical practice guidelines

Rowan G Walker
Med J Aust 2003; 178 (7): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05236.x
Published online: 7 April 2003

In reply: The fundamental purpose of clinical practice guidelines is to improve patient outcomes. Thus, as members of the CARI (Caring for Australians with Renal Insufficiency) Guidelines Steering Committee, we welcome Johnson's letter, which gives us reassurance and renewed enthusiasm to move forward with improving and refining the CARI clinical practice guideline process. The most gratifying revelation in Johnson's survey was the near-90% endorsement of the CARI guidelines as a document providing a useful evidence summary — clearly very reassuring in those areas in which that evidence relates to treatment interventions for patients with renal disease. Of additional interest was the range of responses to questions about matching the recommendations with available evidence. This seems to reflect both an awareness among renal medicine health workers of the importance of evidence-based medicine and a maturing understanding of the need for the evidence to be of high quality.

  • Rowan G Walker



remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.