Managing the resource demands of a large sample size in clinical trials: can you succeed with fewer subjects?
Authors: Adrián V Hernández and Ewout W Steyerberg
Published online: 7 April 2003
To the Editor: Keech and Gebski recently discussed some strategies for answering randomised clinical trial (RCT) questions with fewer subjects.1 We would like to point out another alternative for addressing this important topic — adjustment for baseline characteristics.2-4
Heterogeneity among patients participating in RCTs is common. Prognosis may vary according to important baseline characteristics, which are commonly recorded in RCTs. Heterogeneity may lead to imbalanced treatment arms, even after proper randomisation.3
Covariate adjustment for baseline characteristics is a statistically efficient procedure. It leads to more individualised treatment-effect estimates, corrects for imbalance and improves statistical power.2,3 Hence, it may potentially reduce the necessary sample size of an RCT for the same power as unadjusted analyses. Nevertheless, covariate adjustment is not commonly performed in the RCTs reported in major medical journals.5
We recently performed a simulation study using logistic regression models in the context of RCTs with dichotomous outcomes and one simple dichotomous baseline characteristic in addition to the treatment indicator variable. Covariate adjustment was found to potentially reduce the sample size between 3% and 46%, in direct relation to the strength of the baseline characteristic (odds ratio, 2 to 30). Results of a simulation study in RCTs with survival outcomes, using Cox proportional hazards models, yielded similar results.
Covariate adjustment for well-known and important predictors of patient prognosis is a useful tool for potentially reducing the sample size of RCTs, and should be considered more often in their design and analysis.
References
- Keech AC, Gebski V. Managing the resource demands of a large sample size in clinical trials: can you succeed with fewer subjects? Med J Aust 2002; 177: 445-447. <eMJA full text>
- Piantadosi S. Clinical trials: a methodologic perspective. 1st ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc; 1997. i1082281
- Steyerberg EW, Bossuyt PMM, Lee KL. Clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction: Should we adjust for baseline characteristics? Am Heart J 2000; 139: 745-751. i1082283
- Maas AIR, Steyerberg EW, Murray GD, et al. Why have recent trials of neuroprotective agents in head injury failed to show convincing efficacy? A pragmatic analysis and theoretical considerations. Neurosurgery 1999; 44: 1286-1298. i1082285
- Pocock SJ, Assmann SE, Enos LE, Kasten LE. Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: Current practice and problems. Stat Med 2002; 21: 2917-2930. i1082287
Interpreting Australian Stillbirth Rate Trends: Implications for Surveillance and Continuous Quality Improvement
Aleena M. Wojcieszek, Kirstine Sketcher-Baker, Christine Andrews, Michael Coory, Imogen Kettle, Melissa Malivoire, David Ellwood, Vicki Flenady
Paracetamol in Pregnancy: Uncertain Evidence, Certain Consequences
David J. Tunnicliffe, Miranda Cumpston, Debra Kennedy, Margie Danchin, Armando Teixeira-Pinto
Fatty Liver Disease in Australia: A Narrative Review on the Epidemiology, Natural History, Prognostication and Management in People With Metabolic Dysfunction
Karl Vaz, Daniel Clayton-Chubb, William W. Kemp, Stuart K. Roberts, Ammar Majeed
Birth prevalence, clinical sequelae, and management of congenital cytomegalovirus infections in Australia, 1999–2023: a national prospective study
Ece Egilmezer, Suzy M Teutsch, Carlos Nunez, Stuart T Hamilton, Adam W Bartlett, Pamela Palasanthiran, Elizabeth J Elliott, William D Rawlinson
The number of cancer‐related deaths that could be attributable to spatial disparities in survival in Australia, 2010–2019: a retrospective population‐based cohort study
Charlotte K Bainomugisa, Jessica Cameron, Paramita Dasgupta, Peter Baade
Mandatory research projects during medical specialist training in Australia and New Zealand
Paulina Stehlik, Caitlin Brandenburg, David A Henry