To the Editor: Keech and Gebski recently discussed some strategies for answering randomised clinical trial (RCT) questions with fewer subjects.1 We would like to point out another alternative for addressing this important topic — adjustment for baseline characteristics.2-4
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
Correspondence:
- 1. Keech AC, Gebski V. Managing the resource demands of a large sample size in clinical trials: can you succeed with fewer subjects? Med J Aust 2002; 177: 445-447. <eMJA full text>
- 2. Piantadosi S. Clinical trials: a methodologic perspective. 1st ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc; 1997.
- 3. Steyerberg EW, Bossuyt PMM, Lee KL. Clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction: Should we adjust for baseline characteristics? Am Heart J 2000; 139: 745-751.
- 4. Maas AIR, Steyerberg EW, Murray GD, et al. Why have recent trials of neuroprotective agents in head injury failed to show convincing efficacy? A pragmatic analysis and theoretical considerations. Neurosurgery 1999; 44: 1286-1298.
- 5. Pocock SJ, Assmann SE, Enos LE, Kasten LE. Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: Current practice and problems. Stat Med 2002; 21: 2917-2930.
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.