Counting on citations: a flawed way to measure quality

Garry Walter, Karen Fisher, Sidney Bloch and Glenn Hunt
Med J Aust 2003; 178 (6): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05196.x
Published online: 17 March 2003

The journal Impact Factor and citation counts are misconstrued and misused as measures of scientific quality. Articles must be read in order to judge their quality. We have introduced a system, which may be easily replicated, to identify the best articles published in a journal.

Gloom or glee? Each September, journal editors and publishers anxiously await news of a particular figure from the Institute of Scientific Information (ISI) in Philadelphia, USA. The figure's value is promptly met with despair or delight. We are referring, of course, to the Impact Factor (IF) and the ritual surrounding its release that has come to dominate the editors' and publishers' calendar.

  • Garry Walter1
  • Karen Fisher2
  • Sidney Bloch3
  • Glenn Hunt4

  • 1 Rivendell Unit, Child Adolescent and Family Psychiatric Services, Thomas Walker Hospital, Concord West, NSW.
  • 2 Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC.
  • 3 Department of Psychological Medicine, Research Unit, Rozelle Hospital, Rozelle, NSW.


Competing interests:

None identified.


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.