"Munchausen by proxy syndrome": not just pathological parenting but also problematic doctoring? Another view.
Author: Kieran T Moran
Published online: 3 February 2003
Much has been written about the motivation of perpetrators in Munchausen by proxy syndrome (MBPS), but little, as far as I know, about the motivation of doctors who "collude" with parents in these behaviours. In general, I have no quibble with the analysis by Jureidini and colleagues.1 It is interesting, as they have done, to put forward a theory as to why doctors who are motivated to make "the diagnosis" might fail to recognise invented illness; however, the motivation of the "relentless investigator" is not the only one that should be examined.
Indeed, doctors do not practise in a vacuum and are subject to pressures, societal among others, which may change with the clinical setting, affecting their practice. As a result, we may make mistakes in aspects of the clinical encounter — whether in our assessment of the process, the history, the examination or our interpretation of tests. Thus, when dealing with children, persistent parents may force the hand of even-thinking doctors because of current medicolegal and societal pressures.
I do agree that children are more at risk from doctors who are enthusiastic about making a medical diagnosis and who ignore the social aspects of the consultation. However, concentrating on the motivation of the parent in MBPS cases has not proven useful in practice because of the complex psychopathology underlying such behaviour,2-4 and I doubt that focusing on the motivation of doctors will improve practice for similar reasons.
While the relentless investigator is a particular problem in these cases, factors such as being busy, stressed or forgetful may also account for failure to identify the problem sooner. My concern is that, for an understanding of motivation to be useful in preventing the phenomenon of MBPS, it would be necessary to both reliably identify doctors' motivations and intervene to change these, and I do not believe that either of these steps is feasible.
As a practising paediatrician, I suggest that a more useful approach to this problem of paediatric diagnosis would be to establish guidelines for the problem of the unresolved clinical problem or "difficult diagnosis" (see Box).
The unresolved clinical problem: a practical approach4
Always consider MBPS in the differential diagnosis when the pieces do not seem to fit.
Pay attention to the process of the consultation (how does the patient present?), especially where there is a history of maternal psychological problems.
If worried about missed disease, draw up a list of hypotheses that should be used to direct further testing. Include the process of consultation in these; consult a colleague.
Do not order invasive tests to "reassure" parents.
Consider the cost and harm of tests versus the benefits. Do not overinterpret test results in the clinically well child.
Get corroboration of previous illness from independent sources. Do not accept at face value a history of severe illness in a well child.
Consult with a colleague before doing invasive tests where there is a major and unexplained incongruity between the story and the assessment. This is particularly important in gastroenterology and neurology.
If all appropriate treatments inexplicably fail, be very wary of invasive testing. Consult with a colleague.
Competing interests
References
- Jureidini JN, Shafer AT, Donald TG. "Munchausen by proxy syndrome": not only pathological parenting but also problematic doctoring? Med J Aust 2003; 178: 130-132.<eMJA full text>
- Loader P, Kelly C. Munchausen syndrome by proxy; a narrative approach to explanation. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 1996; 75: 57-61. i1067330
- Nicol AR, Eccles M. Psychotherapy for Munchausen syndrome by proxy. Arch Dis Child 1985; 60: 344-348.
- Eminson M, Postlethwaite RJ, editors. Munchausen syndrome by proxy abuse: a practical approach. Oxford: Butterworth Heineman; 2000. i1067333
Watchful Waiting Compared With Immediate Antibiotics for Urban Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children With Uncomplicated Acute Otitis Media (WATCH): A Non-Inferiority Randomised Controlled Trial
Jennifer S. Reath, Hasantha Gunasekera, Sanja Lujic, Amanda J. Leach, Letitia Campbell, Robyn Walsh, Tim Usherwood, Geoffrey K. Spurling, Claudette A. Tyson, Deborah A. Askew, Kelvin Kong, Chelsea J. Watego, Peter Morris, Wendy Hu, Penelope A. Abbott
A Rare Case of Storage Mite Anaphylaxis in Infancy
Eliza Kluckow, Katie Frith
Beds Still Burning: Suicide Should Not Be in the Vocabulary of Children
Rudi Louis Taylor-Bragge
Progressing Cross-Sector Collaboration for People With Eating Disorders and Higher Weight: Priority Actions From an Expert Roundtable Using a Modified Nominal Group Technique
Hiba Jebeile, Leah Brennan, Tracy Burrows, Xochitl de la Piedad Garcia, Angelique F. Ralph, Supreet Saluja, Evan Atlantis, Sarah P. Garnett, Carmel J. Harrison, Eve T. House, Natalie B. Lister, Lisa Moran, Milan K. Piya, Elizabeth Rieger, Evelyn Smith, Phillipa Hay, Sarah Trobe
Intergenerational Child Protection Contact and Child Development Outcomes: A Whole Population Linked Data Study
Meredith Forsyth, Alicia Montgomerie, Kathleen Falster, Deepa Jeyaseelan, Paul Hotton, John Lynch, Rhiannon M. Pilkington
Impact of the 2025 New South Wales Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prevention Program on Infant Notifications and Hospitalisations: A Population-Based Analysis
Janaki Amin, Sally L. Ellis, Christopher Lambeth, Jessica Gugusheff, Christine Selvey