Connect
MJA
MJA

Ethics review and use of reminder letters in postal surveys: are current practices compromising an evidence-based approach?

Stuart C Howell, Susan Quine and Nicholas J Talley
Med J Aust 2003; 178 (1) || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05043.x
Published online: 6 January 2003

To the Editor: Survey data are difficult to publish when response rates fall below 60%. Reminder letters are the most reliable method of improving response rates in postal surveys,1,2 and three to four reminders are needed to achieve the 60% benchmark. The additional benefit of sending five or more reminders appears negligible, suggesting that four is the optimum number to maximise response rates using this approach.1

The full article is accessible to AMA
members and paid subscribers.
Login to MJA or subscribe now.




Correspondence: 

  • 1. Koloski N, Talley NJ, Boyce PM, Morris-Yates AD. The effects of questionnaire length and lottery ticket inducement on the response rate in mail surveys. Psychol Health 2001; 16: 67-75.
  • 2. Kalantar JS, Talley NJ. The effects of lottery incentive and length of questionnaire on health survey response rates: a randomised study. J Clin Epidemiol 1999; 52: 1117-1122.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.