The prevalence of psychiatric disorders among Vietnamese children and adolescents

Robert S McKelvey, David L Sang, Loretta Baldassar, Lisa Davies, Lynne Roberts and Neil Cutler
Med J Aust 2002; 177 (8): 413-417.
Published online: 21 October 2002


Objective: To determine the prevalence of psychiatric disorders among Vietnamese children and adolescents living in Perth, Western Australia.

Design, participants and setting: A list of Vietnamese households was drawn from Perth telephone directories. A computer program generated a systematic probability sample of households. All children and adolescents aged 9–17 in these households were invited to participate in the study. Children and their parents were interviewed in their home using the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, version 2.3 (DISC-2.3). The child version (DISC-C) was used for children and the parent version (DISC-P) for adults. The study was conducted between July and December 1997.

Main outcome measures: The prevalence of psychiatric disorders in children and adolescents, based on DISC-C and DISC-P data.

Results: Results were based on the 519 children (89.2%) for whom complete data were available. Twenty-three parents (4.4%) reported that their child had one or more disorders on the DISC-P, 82 children (15.8%) reported one or more disorders on the DISC-C, and 18.3% of children were reported to have a disorder on either the DISC-C or the DISC-P. Parent–child concordance on specific diagnoses was very low (0.6%). The great majority of disorders reported were anxiety disorders, especially simple and social phobias.

Conclusions: The combined prevalence of psychiatric disorders among Vietnamese children aged 9–17 was similar to that found among children in Western Australia's general population. Vietnamese children in our study were much more likely to report symptoms of a psychiatric disorder than were their parents.

Many Vietnamese immigrants have been deeply affected by traumatic post-war and migratory events and the stresses inherent in making the transition between vastly different cultural traditions.1-3 Such experiences may lead to psychological problems. Studies of psychiatric disorders among children and adolescents in the general Australian population4-7 report prevalence rates of 14%–21% and suggest higher rates among refugee than non-refugee children.

In our study we sought to determine the prevalence of psychiatric disorders in Vietnamese children and adolescents living in Perth, Western Australia. Such data are needed in order to plan effectively for the mental health needs of this important ethnic minority population.8

Two previous studies2,3 of the prevalence of psychiatric disorders among the children of Vietnamese refugees have produced somewhat contradictory results. Both studies interviewed children but not parents. Krupinski and Burrows3 reported a prevalence of 18.2% for "definite disorders" and 32.0% for "definite and probable disorders" among a cohort of Vietnamese children, adolescents and young adults newly arrived in Victoria. Initially, these rates were higher than those among native-born Australians. However, two years after resettlement, the rates had fallen to 4.4% and 6.6%, respectively, which were substantially lower than those of the general population.3

Holzer et al2 assessed mental disorders among Vietnamese children aged 10–18 years living in Texas.2 The study reported a 36.0% prevalence of psychiatric disorders, which was higher than that found in community-based populations of children in developed countries (typically about 20%9).

Studies of psychiatric disorders in refugee children from various other countries who have resettled abroad10-13 generally report a higher prevalence rate of psychiatric disorders in these children than in non-refugee children living in the same countries.

For simplicity, we use the term "children" to refer to both children and adolescents in this article.

Participants and setting

The study was conducted between July and December 1997. A list of Vietnamese households was generated from telephone directories for the Perth metropolitan area, based on the 100 most common Vietnamese names.2 From this list, a computer program selected a systematic probability sample. (As telephone density in Western Australia is about 94%, this method was judged to offer a relatively unbiased sample of the Vietnamese community.6)

The households selected were contacted by telephone and asked if they would be willing to take part in the study. Initial approaches were made in Vietnamese. If there were Vietnamese children aged between 9 and 17 in the household, oral and written consent for their participation was obtained.

All children aged 9–17 who were willing to participate were interviewed, as well as their parents. The interviews were conducted face-to-face, in private, in subjects' homes.

Study instruments

Interviews were conducted by bilingual lay interviewers using the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, version 2.3 (DISC-2.3) and a demographic questionnaire modelled on the Western Australian Child Health Survey.6 The DISC-2.3 is a structured diagnostic interview based on the revised edition of DSM-III (DSM-III-R).14 It is designed for administration by trained lay interviewers.

The child version of DISC-2.3 (DISC-C) was used for the children and the parent version (DISC-P) for parents.

Cultural and linguistic issues

Before enrolling subjects in the study, the chief investigators met with leaders of the Vietnamese community to enlist their support and cooperation. They were helpful both in suggesting ways to inform the Vietnamese community of the study's objectives and in recommending bilingual, bicultural Vietnamese people to function as lay interviewers. Interviewers were recruited from the Vietnamese community and trained in the use of the DISC-2.3 and the background questionnaire by the chief investigators.

The DISC-2.3 and demographic questionnaire were translated into Vietnamese and back-translated into English to check for accuracy and comprehensibility. A panel of Vietnamese psychologists, a child psychiatrist in Hanoi and an accredited Vietnamese translator and psychologist from Perth reviewed the final translation. The instruments were piloted successfully in Hanoi by lay interviewers trained by the study's chief investigators.

Data analysis

Data were analysed using a scoring program provided by the DISC Study Group at Columbia University. Appropriate t-tests and regression analyses of the DISC-P and DISC-C data were conducted. Because of problems related to the scoring program for the schizophrenia-related disorders, these disorders were scored manually.

Ethics approval

The project was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Perth.

Descriptive and comparative data

Of the Vietnamese households contacted that had children aged 9–17, 283 (93.75%) agreed to participate. The study required a minimum of 450 subjects to identify disorders with a prevalence of 1% or greater. From the 283 participating households, a total of 582 children and adolescents were enrolled. The adults providing information about the children were 64.1% mothers, 28.9% fathers, 6.6% mothers and fathers, and 0.4% others.

Descriptive and comparative data are summarised in Box 1. Over half the children were born in Vietnam and over half arrived in Australia between 1990 and 1995. Almost all were rated by their parents as having adapted easily to Australian life. Almost all parents described their children's health and mental health as excellent or good.

The majority of parents had not completed secondary school. The most common paternal occupations were unemployed, farm and factory work, and self-employed. The most common maternal occupations were homemaker, sewing and factory work.

Psychiatric disorders reported

Of the 582 children in the sample, complete data from the DISC-C and DISC-P interviews were available for 519 (89.2%) (see Box 2).

Based on DISC-P results, 23 parents (4.4%) reported one or more psychiatric disorders in their child, whereas 82 children (15.8%) reported one or more disorders on the DISC-C. Children were thus over three times more likely to report a disorder on the DISC-C than were their parents on the DISC-P.

The great majority of disorders reported by both children and parents were anxiety disorders, especially simple and social phobias. Anxiety disorders accounted for 85% of disorders described by children and 88% of disorders described by parents.

Parent–child concordance on DISC-2.3 diagnoses

For 424 of the children (81.7%), neither the DISC-P nor the DISC-C revealed any psychiatric disorders. For 10 children (2%), both the DISC-P and the DISC-C indicated the presence of a psychiatric disorder, but DISC-P and DISC-C results concurred in the diagnosis for only three of these children (0.6% of the total sample). Thirteen children (2.4%) had a disorder according to the DISC-P but not the DISC-C, while 72 (13.9%) had a disorder according to the DISC-C but not the DISC-P.

No differences were found in the rates of disorder reported for children born in Vietnam, Australia or other countries.


The 18.3% combined prevalence (DISC-C or DISC-P) of psychiatric disorders in our study was similar to the 17.9% prevalence of psychiatric problems for the general child and adolescent population of Western Australia.6 It is also similar to prevalence rates in other parts of Australia4,5,7 and other Western countries.9 It is substantially lower than the prevalence of disorders found among Vietnamese children in the Texan2 and initial Victorian3 studies. On the other hand, it is much higher than the rate of disorders found at two years' follow-up in the Victorian study.3

Our subjects' more limited exposure to the traumas of war and migration (only 5% had experienced or witnessed traumatic events) and their longer time in Australia may help explain the lower rate of disorders found in our study compared with the Texan study and the Victorian initial sample. Furthermore, our study was conducted about 10 years after the other two. All of the children in the Victorian study and 91% of those in the Texas study were born in Vietnam, compared with 53.8% in ours.2,3 Only 5.3% of participants in our study had lived in their new homeland for two years or less, compared with 21.3% in the Texan study and 100% in the Victorian study. There appears to be a direct and negative correlation between the length of time Vietnamese children have spent in their new homeland and the prevalence of mental disorders experienced by them.3

There are several other possible reasons for the lower rate of psychiatric disorders found in our study. One may have been the relative size of the Vietnamese populations assessed. At the time the Texan study2 was conducted there were about 51 300 Vietnamese living in Texas.2 At the time of our study, there were about 9300 Vietnamese living in Perth.8 Thus, it was more likely that our interviewers would know the people they interviewed, which may have made some parents reluctant to disclose potentially negative information.1,15-17 Another reason may have been the inclusion of more than one child from each household. Parents had to complete a separate DISC-P for each child, and may have learned that saying "no" to interview queries about symptoms would reduce the amount of time required for each interview. Finally, the inclusion in our study of children less than 11 years of age, for whom the DISC may be less reliable, may have affected prevalence rates.18

Given the high rates of disruptive behaviour disorders in Australia (eg, the prevalence rate of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder is about 7.5%19), it is surprising that only two Vietnamese parents and children reported them. There are several possible explanations for this: Vietnamese parents may not want to acknowledge their children's unacceptable social behaviours, they may be more tolerant of children's mental health problems than parents in Western countries,20 or disruptive behaviour disorders may be less common among Vietnamese children.

Vietnamese parents reported a very low rate (4.4%) of DSM-III-R disorders and an even lower rate (0.5%) of poor mental health in their children. This reinforces previous findings that Vietnamese and non-Vietnamese Australian parents may have different concepts of what behaviours and feelings constitute a "psychiatric problem" in a child.1

The very low concurrence between the disorders reported by parents and children in our study is a problem shared with other studies using the DISC-2.3.21 It is believed to reflect "situation-specific problems, a child's experience of subjective states of distress that is not shared with the parent ... [and] differences in value systems and in the threshold for judging a behavior to be abnormal".21 Unusual, however, is the large discrepancy between child- and parent-reported rates of disorder. This may be related to parental under-reporting. It may also reflect the inclusion of the diagnoses of simple and social phobias — conditions more likely to be recognised and reported by children than parents.

The high rate of anxiety disorders in our study may reflect problems in the DSM-III-R, on which the DISC-2.3 is based.21 Unlike the later version, DSM-IV, whose diagnoses require significant functional impairment in addition to symptom criteria, the DSM-III-R diagnoses do not, and may lead to an overestimation of the prevalence of anxiety disorders.21

Finally, the DISC-2.3 reflects Western concepts of psychiatric disorders. While it has shown considerable utility in cross-cultural populations, it may embody concepts that do not reflect a Vietnamese understanding of child mental illness.1 Furthermore, the Vietnamese people involved in translating and testing the instruments were almost all urban-dwellers and university graduates, unlike the predominantly rural-origin, non-university-educated Vietnamese who were the parents of our subjects.

Our results suggest several important considerations for clinicians treating the children of Vietnamese refugees and immigrants. The prevalence of psychiatric disorders among them is similar to the rate found among native-born children in Australia and other Western countries. In addition, Vietnamese children are more likely to report anxiety disorders than other psychiatric disorders. Finally, Vietnamese parents are unlikely to recognise, or, if recognised, to report, child psychiatric disorders as they are defined in Western countries. These findings emphasise the need to develop clinical services that are sensitive to Vietnamese cultural traditions that may affect the recognition, reporting and treatment of child and adolescent psychiatric disorders.

1: Descriptive and comparative statistics relating to Vietnamese children aged 9–17 in Perth (= 582)

Proportion of study sample

Demographic and background variables



Born in Vietnam


Arrived in Australia before 1980


Arrived in Australia between 1990 and 1995


Arrived in Australia after 1995


Lived in refugee camp


Witnessed or experienced traumatic events


Parental education

Primary schooling only

25.2% (father); 34.2% (mother)

Some secondary schooling

26.2% (father); 31.2% (mother)

Completed secondary schooling

24.9% (father); 23.3% (mother)

Post-secondary schooling

19% (father); 5.8% (mother)

Acculturation indices

Speaks English well or very well


School performance

Upper third of class


Middle third of class


Bottom third of class



Mostly Australian


Mostly Vietnamese


Equal numbers of each


Adapted easily to Australian life


Health indices

Excellent or good health


Chronic medical problem


Activities limited by health problem


Taking prescription medication


Mental health









Activities limited by mental health problem


Received mental health treatment in past six months


2: Number of DSM-III-R disorders14 (%, 95% CI) in Vietnamese children aged 9–17 in Perth, reported by parents (DISC-P) and children (DISC-C) (n = 519)

DISC diagnosis



Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder

2 (0.39%, 0.05%–1.39%)

2 (0.39%, 0.05%–1.39%)



9 (1.73%, 0.80%–3.27%)*



2 (0.39%, 0.05%–1.39%)

Avoidant disorder

3 (0.58%, 0.12%–1.68%)

4 (0.77%, 0.21%–1.96%)



1 (0.19%, 0–1.10%)

Conduct disorder


2 (0.39%, 0.05%–1.39%)

Major depression


1 (0.19%, 0–1.10%)

Diurnal enuresis


1 (0.19%, 0–1.10%)



1 (0.19%, 0–1.10%)

Generalised anxiety


1 (0.19%, 0–1.10%)

Nocturnal enuresis

1 (0.19%, 0–1.10%)


Obsessive compulsive disorder


3 (0.58%, 0.12%–1.68%)

Overanxious disorder


5 (0.96%, 0.31%–2.23%)

Panic and agoraphobia


8 (1.54%, 0.67%–3.01%)*

Schizophrenia-related disorders


4 (0.77%, 0.21%–1.96%)

Separation anxiety

1 (0.19%, 0–1.10%)

3 (0.58%, 0.12%–1.68%)

Simple phobia

17 (3.30%, 1.90%–5.20%)

40 (7.70%, 5.56%–10.35%)*

Social phobia

1 (0.19%, 0–1.10%)

41 (7.90%, 5.73%–10.56%)*

Total number of diagnoses



Total number of children with a diagnosis

23/519 (4.40%, 2.80%–6.60%)

82/519 (15.80%, 12.80%–19.20%)*

DISC = Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children: parent version (DISC-P), child version (DISC-C).

* Difference between DISC-P and DISC-C results statistically significant (P < 0.05).

Number of disorders reported per child



No disorder, 496 (95.5%); one disorder, 21 (4.0%); two disorders, 2 (0.4%)

No disorders, 437 (84.2%); one disorder, 52 (10.0%); two disorders, 19 (3.7%); three disorders, 7 (1.3%); four disorders, 3 (0.6%); five disorders, 1 (0.2%).

Received 21 December 2001, accepted 1 June 2002

  • Robert S McKelvey1
  • David L Sang2
  • Loretta Baldassar3
  • Lisa Davies4
  • Lynne Roberts5
  • Neil Cutler6

  • 1 University of Western Australia, Perth, WA.
  • 2 Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Perth, WA.
  • 3 Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR, USA.



This study was supported by grants from the Commonwealth Department of Human Services and Health and the Department of Paediatrics at the University of Western Australia.

Competing interests:

None identified.

  • 1. McKelvey RS, Baldassar LV, Sang DL, Roberts L. Vietnamese parental perceptions of child and adolescent mental illness. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1999; 38: 1302-1309.
  • 2. Holzer CE, Swanson JW, HuynHa MQ, et al. Psychiatric disorder among the Vietnamese-origin population in Texas: a diagnostic survey of 100 households in Harris and Galveston counties. Final report to the Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation. Galveston, Texas: University of Texas Medical Branch, 1988.
  • 3. Krupinski J, Burrows G. The price of freedom. Sydney: Pergamon, 1987.
  • 4. Connell HM, Irvine L, Rodney J. Psychiatric disorder in Queensland primary school children. Aust Paediatr J 1982; 18: 177-180.
  • 5. Sawyer MG, Sarris A, Baghurst PA, et al. The prevalence of emotional and behaviour disorders and patterns of service utilisation in children and adolescents. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 1990; 24: 323-330.
  • 6. Zubrick SR, Silburn SR, Garton A, et al. Western Australian child health survey: developing health and well-being in the nineties. Perth: Australian Bureau of Statistics and Institute for Child Health Research, 1995.
  • 7. Sawyer MG, Arney FM, Baghurst JJ, et al. The mental health of young people in Australia: key findings from the child and adolescent component of the national survey of mental health and well-being. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2001; 35: 806-814.
  • 8. Australian social trends 1997. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2000.
  • 9. Garland AF, Hough RL, McCabe KM, et al. Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in youths across five sectors of care. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2001; 40: 409-418.
  • 10. Kinzie JD, Sack WH, Angell RH, et al. The psychiatric effects of massive trauma on Cambodian children, I: the children. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1986; 25: 370-376.
  • 11. Muecke MA, Sassi L. Anxiety among Cambodian refugee adolescents in transit and in resettlement. West J Nurs Res 1992; 14: 267-291.
  • 12. Hjern A, Angel B, Hojer B. Persecution and behavior: a report of refugee children from Chile. Child Abuse Negl 1991; 15: 239-248.
  • 13. Tousignant M, Habimana E, Biron C, et al. The Quebec Adolescent Refugee Project: psychopathology and family variables in a sample from 35 nations. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1999; 38: 1426-1432.
  • 14. National Institute of Mental Health. Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, Version 2.3 (DISC-2.3). Washington, DC: NIMH; 1992.
  • 15. McKelvey RS, Sang DL, Tu HC. Is there a role for child psychiatry in Vietnam? Aust N Z J Psychiatry 1997; 31: 114-119.
  • 16. Hickey GC. Village in Vietnam. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press, 1964.
  • 17. Tung TM. Indochinese patients. Washington, DC: Action for South East Asians, 1980.
  • 18. Schwab-Stone ME, Shaffer D, Dulcan MK, et al. Criterion validity of the NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version 2.3 (DISC-2.3). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1996; 35: 878-888.
  • 19. Graetz BW, Sawyer MG, Hazell PL, et al. Validity of DSM-IV subtypes in a nationally representative sample of Australian children and adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2001; 40: 1410-1417.
  • 20. Weisz JR, Suwanlert S, Chaiyasit W, et al. Adult attitudes toward over- and undercontrolled child problems: urban and rural parents and teachers from Thailand and the United States. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1991; 32: 645-654.
  • 21. Shaffer D, Fisher P, Dulcan MK, et al. The NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version 2.3 (DISC-2.3): description, acceptability, prevalence rates, and performance in the MECA study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1996; 35: 865-877.


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Responses are now closed for this article.