Connect
MJA
MJA

Should radiologists and pathologists talk to patients?

Ibrahim M Zardawi
Med J Aust 2002; 177 (4): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04738.x
Published online: 19 August 2002

To the Editor: The practice of radiology and pathology has changed dramatically in the past two decades. Increased use of multidisciplinary assessments and interventional techniques has meant greater exposure of patients to radiologists and pathologists. When patients undergo investigations, they are invariably anxious, usually expect the worst, and want the result as soon as possible. Therefore, there is pressure to provide an immediate answer to the problem at hand. In most instances, it would be possible to offer a diagnosis. However, many radiologists and pathologists are reluctant to discuss investigations with patients in detail.1

  • 1. Valley SR, Manton Mills JO. Should radiologists talk to patients? BMJ 1990; 300: 305-306.
  • 2. Bury RF. Should radiologists talk to patients? BMJ 1990; 300: 610.
  • 3. Charig M. Should radiologists talk to patients? BMJ 1990; 300: 610.
  • 4. Watt PCH, Caughley L, Varma M. Should pathologists talk to patients? BMJ 1990; 300: 1079.
  • 5. Raza S, Rosen MP, Chorney K, et al. Patient expectation and cost of immediate reporting of screening mammography: talk isn't cheap. Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177: 579-583.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.