Letters
Ethics
Volume 177 - Issue 1

Confidentiality

Authors:  Peter C Arnold, Bernadette M Tobin, Steven R Leeder and Ernest R Somerville

Med J Aust 2002; 177 (1): 165. || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04647.x
Published online: 1 July 2002
Download PDF (75 KB)
Share: Share on Blue Sky Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share by email

In reply: Arnold makes a good point. We agree with him, and would resist today's increasing tendency, on public health grounds, to make it mandatory for doctors to report a variety of conditions suffered by their patients. In general the community is well served if doctors have the discretion to decide, in any particular case, whether the public interest in maintaining a patient's confidentiality is outweighed by the public interest in breaching that confidentiality in order to protect innocent third parties.

Authors

  • Peter C Arnold1
  • Bernadette M Tobin MA PhD1
  • Steven R Leeder PhD FRACP FFPHM1
  • Ernest R Somerville MB BS FRACP FRCP1
  • 1. PO Box 280, Edgecliff, NSW.
  • 2. Plunkett Centre for Ethics in Healthcare, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW.
  • 3. Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, NSW.
  • 4. Epilepsy Unit and Department of Neurology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW.

Correspondence: parnold@ozemail.com.au

View this article on Wiley Online Library