Connect
MJA
MJA

Public reporting of comparative information about quality of healthcare

Martin N Marshall and Robert H Brook
Med J Aust 2002; 176 (5): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04373.x
Published online: 4 March 2002

The Australian Council for Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC) plans to publish data about the performance of the Australian healthcare system. It is probably inevitable that this kind of information, which is actively disseminated and reported in such a way as to encourage readers to draw comparisons, will be used in the near future by the media, the public and politicians to make public judgements about the relative performance of individual hospitals or even individual doctors or groups of doctors. Initiatives such as these will therefore be perceived as a threat by some health professionals and some organisations. Would this negative response be justified? What might be gained from public disclosure and how can the policy be implemented successfully?


  • 1 National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, Williamson Building, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • 2 RAND Health, Santa Monica, CA.


Correspondence: martin.marshall@man.ac.uk

  • 1. Marshall MN, Shekelle PG, Leatherman S, Brook RH. What do we expect to gain from the public release of performance data? A review of the evidence. JAMA 2000; 283: 1866-1874.
  • 2. Schuster MA, McGlynn EA, Brook RH. How good is the quality of U.S. health care? Milbank Q 1998; 76: 517-563.
  • 3. Seddon ME, Marshall MN, Campbell SM, Roland MO. Systematic review of studies of quality of clinical care in general practice in the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand. Quality in Health Care 2001; 10: 152-158.
  • 4. Davis D, Thomson M, Oxman A, Haynes B. Changing physician performance: a systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA 1995; 274: 700-705.
  • 5. Davies H. Public release of performance data and quality improvement: internal responses to external data by US health care providers. Quality in Health Care 2001; 10: 104-110.
  • 6. Marshall MN, Shekelle PG, Leatherman S, Brook RH. Dying to know: public release of comparative data in health care. London: Nuffield Trust, 2000.
  • 7. Department of Health. The NHS plan: a plan for investment, a plan for reform. London: Department of Health, 2000.
  • 8. Hannan EL. Measuring hospital outcomes: don't make perfect the enemy of good! J Health Serv Res Policy 1998; 3: 67-69.
  • 9. Smith P. On the unintended consequences of publishing performance data in the public sector. Int J Public Adm 1995; 18: 277-310.
  • 10. Peterson ED, DeLong ER, Jollis JG, et al. The effects of New York's bypass surgery provider profiling on access to care and patient outcomes in the elderly. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32: 993-999.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.