Public reporting of comparative information about quality of healthcare

Martin N Marshall and Robert H Brook
Med J Aust 2002; 176 (5): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04373.x
Published online: 4 March 2002

The Australian Council for Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC) plans to publish data about the performance of the Australian healthcare system. It is probably inevitable that this kind of information, which is actively disseminated and reported in such a way as to encourage readers to draw comparisons, will be used in the near future by the media, the public and politicians to make public judgements about the relative performance of individual hospitals or even individual doctors or groups of doctors. Initiatives such as these will therefore be perceived as a threat by some health professionals and some organisations. Would this negative response be justified? What might be gained from public disclosure and how can the policy be implemented successfully?

  • Martin N Marshall1
  • Robert H Brook2

  • 1 National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, Williamson Building, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • 2 RAND Health, Santa Monica, CA.



remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.